Monday, March 30, 2009

MBPJ given four days to come up with solution to traffic problem

THE Petaling Jaya Municipal Council (MBPJ) has been given four days to come up with a solution to the Paramount View Condominium traffic problems.
Kampung Tunku assemblyman Lau Weng San said a decision had to be made within two weeks.
"If the matter still cannot be solved, we have to bring it up to the state government,” said Lau after chairing a public objection hearing at the MBPJ headquarters on Thursday.
The hearing was attended by about 30 residents, representatives from the developer, MBPJ and Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB) officials.
The 233-unit condominium was nearing completion but residents in the area are in a hot dispute over the placement of access roads leading to the project, including SS1/39, Jalan SS1/25 and Jalan SS1/26.
Tempers flared during the hearing as the residents questioned the MBPJ for allowing such a project to be approved without having a traffic impact assessment study done.
Besides the objections from residents, the developers came to a deadend when the TNB issued a court injunction to prevent them from building an access road leading into SS1/26.
“Because of safety issues, we do not allow roads to be built parallel to our high tension cables. It would also pose a problem when we want to do maintenance work on the towers,” said a TNB official.
A representative from Sri Aman Development Sdn Bhd said MBPJ had given them the go-ahead to build the access road.
“Building the road connecting SS1/39 to Jalan 21/1 will also be a problem because the gradient is too steep and the fire department will not approve it,” he said.
Lau requested the MBPJ engineering department to install speed breakers along SS1/25 and Jalan 22/44 so that the contractors could temporarily use the roads until a decision is made.

1 comment:

Unknown said...

Dun have proper planning that all!

1. Road Access Problem that affected the traffic around that area.

2. Is the High Tension Cable too close to the condo already? That will be another issue in future?

who should responsible toward the cases above? Is the profit is more important than human life?