巫統一再玩弄種族和宗教情緒，馬華為何還要繼續和它結盟呢？

雪州民主行動黨甘榜東姑區州議員劉永山於2015年4月20日在八打靈再也所發表的文告：

巫統黨員和領袖一而再，再而三玩弄和煽動種族和宗教情緒，馬華和其他國陣成員黨已經沒有必要繼續留在國陣。反之，馬華和其他非巫統國陣成員黨應該大膽和巫統脫離關係，甚至退出國陣。

一群來自八打靈再也南區（靈南）區部的巫統黨員和領袖昨天在美丹花園的一座基督教堂示威，抗議該教堂在90巴仙穆斯林的地區掛上十字架。這群示威人士自稱為當地居民，但是經過網友們一番人肉搜尋之後，他們原來是當地的巫統黨員和大選候選人。其中一位成為阿都拉阿布巴卡的發言者，更被認出是全國總警長卡立阿布巴卡的胞兄。

經過今年年初的“杯葛華商論”、接著迄今巫統主席納吉一直未對丹州伊斯蘭刑事法一事表態，現在再來發生巫統黨員在教堂前示威，這一切足以證明當下的巫統不再是50年代和馬華及國大黨組成聯合政府的好兄弟。

反之，現在的巫統已變質成為一個玩弄種族和宗教霸權的喪屍。馬華和其他非巫統國陣成員黨一直不敢和巫統劃清界限，將遲早成為這個無藥可就喪屍的犧牲品，屆時回頭已是太晚。

馬華如果不要愧對華裔選民，那就應該痛定思痛，善用其殘餘的政治生命和價值，即除了嚴厲譴責巫統領袖之外，也應該宣布退出巫統主導的國陣以加速巫統政權的瓦解和垮台。唯有這樣，馬華才能在馬來西亞政治歷史中佔有一席可歌之地。

此外，警察總長卡立阿布巴卡不應在這事情擁有個人立場，反之他必須以專業的角度調查此案。他在案發一天之內就表示此案不含煽動元素，甚至企圖為事情降溫，說這並不觸及宗教問題。他這番言論足以證明他在此事擁有個人立場，因為在案發不到24小時之內，他如何評定此案不涉及煽動或宗教情緒呢？

其實，事實剛好和他所說的相反，因為涉及示威的人士都可以在《刑事法》典第296、298和298A條文下被調查或控上法庭。《刑事法典》典第296、298和298A條文闡明：

“Disturbing a religious assembly

296. Whoever voluntarily causes disturbance to any assembly lawfully engaged in the performance of religious worship or religious ceremonies, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or with fine or with both.

Uttering words, etc., with deliberate intent to wound the religious feelings of any person

298. Whoever, with deliberate intention of wounding the religious feelings of any person, utters any word or makes any sound in the hearing of that person, or makes any gesture in the sight of that person, or places any object in the sight of that person, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or with fine or with both.

Causing, etc., disharmony, disunity, or feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will, or prejudicing, etc., the maintenance of harmony or unity, on grounds of religion

298A. (1) Whoever by words, either spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representations, or by any act, activity or conduct, or by organizing, promoting or arranging, or assisting in organizing, promoting or arranging, any activity, or otherwise in any other manner—

(a) causes, or attempts to cause, or is likely to cause disharmony, disunity, or feelings of enmity, hatred or ill will; or

(b) prejudices, or attempts to prejudice, or is likely to prejudice, the maintenance of harmony or unity,

on grounds of religion, between persons or groups of persons professing the same or different religions, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term of not less than two years and not more than five years.”

我呼籲警察應該公平調查此事。由於警察總長的胞兄涉及此案，因此，警察為了彰顯公正，警察總長不能涉及此案的任何調查工作。加上此案屬於高度敏感案件，我認為查案官應該直接向內政部長負責禀報此案。

劉永山