Showing posts with label NEP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NEP. Show all posts

Friday, July 30, 2010

Kejayaan Melayu/Islam di Singapura hasil usaha sendiri



29 Jul 2010
OLEH BERITA HARIAN SINGAPURA
PENCAPAIAN masyarakat Melayu/Islam Singapura adalah hasil usaha mereka sendiri - menerusi kerja keras dan kesungguhan - selaras dengan nilai meritokrasi.
Tiada bantuan khas mahupun layanan istimewa daripada pemerintah yang membantu memacu kemajuan Melayu/Islam di sini.
Namun, walau perlu bersaing dalam sekitaran yang begitu sengit, masyarakat Melayu tidak mahu mencapai kemajuan dengan cara lain.
Dalam ucapannya di majlis Anugerah Jauhari di Hotel Shang-ri La semalam, Editor Berita Harian/Berita Minggu, Encik Guntor Sadali, berkata asas pembangunan Melayu Singapura sejak 45 tahun lalu adalah berlandaskan prinsip berdikari.
'Kita tidak mahu disuap atau terlalu bergantung kepada pemerintah. Dalam erti kata lain, masyarakat kita menolak sikap menopang (crutch mentality),' ujar beliau dalam majlis yang dihadiri lebih 300 pemimpin dan tokoh masyarakat daripada pelbagai bidang.
Turut hadir di majlis yang mengiktiraf Jauhari masyarakat Melayu itu ialah Menteri Tenaga Manusia, Encik Gan Kim Yong.
Intipati ucapan Encik Guntor itu ialah sebagai respons kepada teguran mantan Perdana Menteri Malaysia, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, baru-baru ini supaya Melayu di negaranya tidak ditimpa nasib yang sama seperti Melayu Singapura.
Menurut Encik Guntor, komen sedemikian sering dilemparkan kepada masyarakat Melayu di sini, bukan sahaja daripada Dr Mahathir, malah sesetengah pemimpin lain di seberang Tambak.
Tetapi beliau menggesa masyarakat supaya tenang.
'Masyarakat kita kini sudah berubah daripada 45 tahun lalu. Kita telah membangunkan identiti dan falsafah hidup sendiri yang berbeza daripada saudara kita di seberang Tambak.
'Kita mungkin pakai baju yang sama, makan makanan yang sama, bertutur bahasa yang sama dan mengamalkan budaya yang sama. Tapi persamaan kita berhenti di situ,' katanya.
Beliau menegaskan bahawa Melayu Singapura pastinya tidak mahu dilabel sebagai malas dan manja.
Lantaran itulah masyarakat Melayu bekerja keras untuk mengumpulkan sendiri dana bagi membina masjid dan madrasah, dan kini boleh berbangga sebagai pemilik bangunan-bangunan tersebut.
Menerusi usahanya sendiri juga, Melayu Singapura boleh berbangga dengan peranannya membantu anggota-anggota masyarakat yang memerlukan sama ada dari segi kewangan, pendidikan dan latihan pekerjaan.
Menurut Encik Guntor, komen Dr Mahathir itu mungkin merujuk kepada kuasa politik Melayu di sini.
Namun, beliau menekankan bahawa Melayu Singapura tidak menyamakan kuasa dengan menghunus keris. Sebaliknya, Melayu di sini berpendapat ilmu itulah kuasa sejati.
'Anak-anak kita menghadiri sekolah yang sama dengan kanak-kanak lain dengan tujuan menerima pendidikan menyeluruh dan mencapai keputusan yang baik.
'Memang mencabar, seperti kanak-kanak lain, anak-anak kita tidak ada pilihan lain selain bekerja keras. Inilah realiti kehidupan di Singapura yang kita terima. Pastinya tiada jalan mudah untuk mencapai kejayaan,' ujar beliau.
Encik Guntor akur walaupun semakin ramai Melayu yang kini memegang jawatan profesional, tetap ada sogolongan Melayu yang masih ketinggalan.
Walaupun demikian, beliau menegaskan bahawa masyarakat enggan menerima layanan istimewa kerana ia hanya akan merendahkan nilai pencapaian Melayu sehingga terpijak maruahnya.
'Meritokrasi ternyata sistem yang baik dan adil. Ia mendorong kita bekerja keras dan berbangga dengan pencapaian kita.
'Bagi masyarakat Melayu Singapura, kita tidak boleh memandang ke belakang,' ujarnya.

Sunday, July 20, 2008

不分种族颁发奖学金

最近公共服务局调整奖学金配额引起马来社会的不满。许多右派马来组织最近纷纷站出来附议林茂区国会议员凯利的要求,即要求最高元首依据联邦宪法插手处理奖学金配额的问题。

他们的理由是这项措施将会打击土著社会的发展,扩大土著和非土著专业人士的距离。玛拉工艺大学名誉校长丹斯里阿都拉曼甚至认为,奖学金分配也应反映出大马的种族比率。

他说:“如果种族比例显示大马土著佔67巴仙,那大马土著专业人士比例须达67巴仙。若未达67巴仙,他们必须获得协助。”

这种以数字零和游戏作为分配国家资源的做法是落伍的。其背后理由说出来更是荒腔走板。

公共服务局奖学金的资金是来自全体马来西亚国民。既然资金是来自全体国民,就自然应该花在所有人民的身上,尤其是来自中下阶层但品学兼优的优异生,而不是依据种族或肤色来判断。

在之前,90巴仙的奖学金颁给考获马来西亚教育文凭的中五土著毕业生,让他们在国内外报读预科班,然后进入海外大学就读。

现在,公共服务局要调整奖学金数额,即把55巴仙的奖学金颁给土著学生,另外45巴仙则颁给非土著学生。

其实,不管是55巴仙还是90巴仙,当局以肤色来决定谁比较需要帮助是过时的做法。马来西亚要成一个真正先进前卫的国家,就必须抛开肤色的歧见。

有人说土著若占人口67巴仙,则应该获得67的奖学金,若这个道理可以接受,我们是否以后在生活的每一方面都要根据67巴仙的诅咒?例如土著获得67巴仙的小贩执照、德士执照、私人公司要有至少67巴仙的土著、甚至家庭成员也要有67巴仙的土著不成?我们是否也能够要求富裕的土著商家把其33巴仙的财富拨出来分发给非土著穷人?

可见这是多么不可思议的事!

要申请公共服务局奖学金,学生除了品学兼优之外,其家庭背景也是非常重要。我们没有必要为了填补土著固打而把珍贵的奖学金颁给来自中上阶层的土著学生,可是我们绝对不能因为土著固打而剥夺贫穷学生的升学需求,不管这名学生是来自什么家庭背景。

最近雪州政府为舒解贫困人民的生活压力,决定派发五公斤白米、一公斤白糖和一罐炼奶予月收入低于1500令吉的各种族贫穷家庭。虽然许多人认为这是民粹政策,但是在高通膨时代,这微薄的援助对他们的意义重大。

雪州政府不分种族协助穷人,不懂凯利懂不懂?

Monday, November 19, 2007

Unfair cancellation of government tender

We also received a mailed-complaint that the tender offered by a bumiputera company to supply, install, test, commission and configure IT equipment (Total Hospital Information System Phase 2) for Selayang Hospital was cancelled by the Selangor State Health Department as the Division of Procurement and Privatisation of the Ministry of Health had in a letter directed to the Selangor State Health Department informed that another company named Systematic Conglomerate Sdn. Bhd. had appealed to the Ministry and was granted the contract to provide operation and back-up service as well as to upgrade the equipment, software and maintenance of Selayang Hospital Total Hospital Information System (THIS) for 3 years with the option of another 3-year extension with effective from 1st September 2007.

From the complaint we received, the tender was called by the Selangor State Health Department and several bumiputera contractors offered their tenders.

It was later intervened by the Ministry of Health and the whole tender process was suspended and the Selangor State Health Department issued letter to all bidder to cancel the tender.

It was unfair for the bidders as they have already submitted their quotation with the hope of securing the project when the tender was cancelled when another competitor stepped-in and appealed to be granted the project.

Such happening reflects very poor on the transparency and integrity of the government.

It is even more shocking that a photograph was also provided that features the Executive Chairman Dato' Amanullah Mohamed Yusoof and Managing Director Haji Wan Azhar Ali of Systematic Conglomerate Sdn. Bhd. presenting a mock cheque of RM50,000 to MCA Johor on 10th April 2007.

We will write in to the Auditor-General to request him to carry out a proper audit on the whole tender process in supplying, installing, testing, commissioning and configuring IT equipment (Total Hospital Information System Phase 2) for Selayang Hospital. We will also consider lodging a report with ACA but for the first step, Health Minister should come clear to explain all this.

Double-discriminative policy

Typical understanding of a Bumiputera status company is that 51% or more of the shareholders of the company must be bumiputeras but we have received a mailed complaint to show that the definition of a Bumiputera company has gone deeper that such company must also employ more than 51% bumiputera as employee.

This is double-discriminative policy as bumiputera companies should be given the free hand to operate including in handling their employment preferences based on meritocracy.

If the government is serious about its slogan of “Cemerlang, Gemilang, Terbilang” to create a world-class economic system to transform Malaysia into a knowledge-based innovative economy, it must end the NEP-mentality in our economy and fully restore the policy of meritocracy and performance excellence coupled with social need to provide employment opportunities to economically-backward Malaysians regardless of race.

In Budget 2008, the Government had announced that beginning financial year 2008, PLCs will be required to disclose their employment composition by race and gender, as well as programmes undertaken to develop domestic and Bumiputera vendors. The private sector should leverage upon the strength of Malaysia’s diversity by employing Malaysians from all ethnic groups.

Why this has not been done by the government in public services and GLCs? And what moral authority does the government has in requiring PLCs to disclose their employment composition by race in year 2008 when government agencies and GLCs are not compelled to do it?

All companies, be it bumiputera companies or not, should be allowed to employ the most qualified and most competent Malaysians with competitive remunerations and restore a culture of excellence and meritocracy.

One simple test of whether the government is seriously committed to abandon the baggages of past NEP policies to create a world-class university system is whether it has the political will to end the brain drain depriving Malaysia of the best and brightest for the development of the country.

Tuesday, November 13, 2007

国油政策不公平

我对首相署副部长拿督阿都拉曼的答案表示非常惊讶、失望和遗憾。

他说非土著若要参与国油公司的“供应商发展计划”,其中一项条件就是这家公司至少70%股权必须由土著持有,而且公司管理层必须多数是土著。

上市公司要有30巴仙的股权保留给土著,这是我们都知道的事实。但是,为何国油能够获得‘优惠’,把这个巴仙率推高至70巴仙?

而且公司的管理层必须有土著控制?

难道这不是分裂国民的企图吗?

难道这不是歧视非土著吗?

难道许多非土著驾车人士不愿意光顾国油油站,只因为国油的政策对非土著不友善。


非土著要成为国油供应商
条件∶土著股权70%

updated:2007-11-13 20:32:55 MYT

(吉隆坡讯)首相署副部长拿督阿都拉曼表示,非土著若要参与国油公司的“供应商发展计划”,公司至少70%股权必须由土著持有,而且公司管理层必须多数是土著。

阿都拉曼周二(13日)在下议院回答马华亚罗士打区议员曹智雄的提问时表示,这项计划全权开放给土著公司,而且有关公司必须要拥有特定的条件。

他说,除了上述条件,另外一种情况就是供应商本身必须持有至少51%股权,本身是公司持有人及业者,缴足资本最少10万令吉且在1965年公司法令下注册,同时必须自己另外准备至少20%计划最初投资时的金额。

他表示,这项计划是在1993年开始,主要是为了协助与引导企业家,成为国油在其他领域的产品或服务供应商。
(星洲日报?2007.11.13)

Friday, September 14, 2007

Syed Hamid Albar on BBC Hardtalk

For those who missed the fantastic program or do not subscribe to BBC/Astro, you can view the whole interview online here.

Below are some intro from BBC website:

In a HardTalk programme first broadcast on Thursday 13 September 2007, Sarah
Montague talks to Malaysian Foreign Minister Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar.

Malaysia has just marked fifty years of independence, and there's much
to celebrate.

Living standards have improved immeasurably over the past
five decades, illiteracy has been virtually eradicated and the economy is doing
well.

But do Indian and Chinese Malaysians have as much to celebrate as
the Malay population?

Sarah Montague talks to Dato Seri Syed Hamid Albar
about whether the law giving preferential treatment to Malay and other
indigenous groups is now outdated.

HARDtalk can be seen on BBC World at
03:30h GMT (not Asia), 08:30h GMT, 14:30h GMT, 20:30h GMT, 23:30h GMT (not Asia)

It can also be seen on BBC News 24 at 0430 and 2330.

Thursday, April 05, 2007

Full text of Raja Nazrin's keynote address at the Bar Council

Full text of Raja Nazrin's keynote address at the Bar Council

KEYNOTE ADDRESS BY DULI YANG TERAMAT MULIA RAJA MUDA PERAK DARUL RIDZUAN RAJA NAZRIN SHAH IBNI SULTAN AZLAN MUHIBBUDDIN SHAH AT THE 'YOUNG MALAYSIANS' ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION ON NATIONAL UNITY AND DEVELOPMENT IN MALAYSIA: PROSPECTS AND CHALLENGES FOR NATION BUILDING

DATE: 3 APRIL 2007 TIME: 8:45AM VENUE: BAR COUNCIL, KUALA LUMPUR

Ladies and Gentlemen:

1. It is my pleasure to be here to deliver the keynote address at this Roundtable Discussion on National Unity and Development in Malaysia: Challenges and Prospects for Nation Building. I am always happy to take part in an event where there are many young informed Malaysians. I find that this is time well spent. Not only does it give me a chance to share my thoughts, but it also lets me do a bit of opinion research among the younger generation. We like to say that our youths are the future of this country, but then we proceed to ignore or marginalise them. We want our future generations to be able to think and act wisely, but then we do not give them sufficient opportunities to do so.

2. In my view, this is not a good way to prepare those who will take our place. If the young are to be good leaders and citizens, they must be exposed to more than just abstract concepts. Even those nation states which have failed miserably have had great political ideals. I believe that good and upright leadership must be demonstrated. It has to be both taught and observed at work. Then, those who are found to be able must be mentored by those who are capable. In this way, success can be learned and replicated. Finally, the young must be given responsibilities they can handle. They should be allowed to make mistakes along the way as part of their overall learning process. If we do these things, our actions will echo loudly into the future.

3. My address this morning is on the challenges and prospects of nation building, a topic that is of the greatest and gravest importance. Nation building is essential to national unity which lies at the heart of what this country was, is and will be. With the passage of time, it seems that we are starting to forget this and it is imperative that we do not. In the time available, I hope to say enough to provide some fuel for the discussions to follow. It is my earnest wish that you will gain some further perspectives on the nature of nation building and that you will also deliberate on specific actionable ways to further it in this country.

4. Confucius insisted that language must be properly used if things are to get done, if justice is not to go astray, and if people are not to "stand about in helpless confusion." He disapproved of those who misused words to hide their true intentions and actions. So what exactly is nation building? Not surprisingly, there are many definitions, some which differ by a little and others by quite a lot. In his book, The Making of a Nation, for example, Professor Cheah Boon Kheng defined it as "both economic progress and socio-political integration of a nation, i.e. prosperity and national unity." This captures what are hopefully the two end results of nation building, but it makes no mention of its nature and process. I prefer the more common understanding, which is that it is the use of state power across different dimensions to ensure that a country is politically stable and viable in the long term. These dimensions include ethnicity and religion.

5. As a brief footnote, it should be noted that nation building is a heated and even hated notion in some parts of the world. The main reasons for this are, first, that it is taking place in the midst of great domestic turmoil and, second, that it is primarily initiated and managed by foreign powers. Trying to cobble a functioning state by papering over deep social and political rifts is, of course, easier said than done. History has shown us time and again, that it is much easier to break down, rather than build up, nations.

6. In the case of Malaysia, nation building has occurred in generally peaceful circumstances. It was not imposed by another country. And it is undertaken mainly by collective choice rather than compulsion. The fact that we have been able to forge a nation without resorting to the rule of the gun has made us something of a rarity and a case to be studied, if not emulated. It has allowed a relatively effective system of governance to develop. Our track record at development and resolving problems such as illiteracy, poverty and poor health has been good.

7. There is, of course, much more that can be done. Our institutions of governance are far from perfect and quality improvements will probably occupy us for at least the next fifty years, if not longer. Nevertheless, for all the criticisms that have been made, it is only common sense that we could not have survived, let alone prosper, these last 50 years if government institutions had not been responsive or effective.

8. So what are the central challenges to nation building going forward? Let me speak first more generally about the world, and then move specifically to Malaysia. To my mind, there are many challenges, but the one that stands out most is that of having to balance the need for change with that of continuity. Globalisation, in particular, has unleashed sweeping economic, political, social and cultural transformations that have weakened national institutions, values and norms. It is as if all the boats on the ocean had suddenly lost their anchors, rudders and compasses overnight. Naturally, this has produced a strong reaction in the form of a desire to preserve identity, character and tradition. These are among the strongest motivations known to mankind and have been at the foreground or background of practically every conflict that has ever been waged. Add to this, a deep sense of deprivation, powerlessness and injustice, both real and imagined, and the tension between change and continuity mount greatly.

9. Managing change on a national level is never easy, and certainly not on the scale and speed that we are witnessing. Multi-ethnic countries have to be especially watchful, and particularly if they have a weak sense of national collective identity. In the absence of a strong binding nationalism, they are prone to polarisation and competition along ethno-religious lines. The state, which may well start out by being a relatively honest broker, can become increasingly pressured to act in ways that favour the interests of one group over another. If the pendulum swings too far in one direction, dissatisfaction and frustrations will inevitably result. These can be expressed in ways that range from passive non-cooperation to active opposition and even violent conflict. To a large extent, this has led to the fragmentation of states.

10. Countries need to recognise the larger macro forces at work and understand their implications. They have to engage creatively to ensure that there are sufficient investments in social capital and cohesion. They must create and capitalise on co-operative systems within societies. In recent times, it has become usual to try and place the blame for the disintegrating state of world affairs on the doorstep of religion. This is a misunderstanding of the first order. Religion is not the cause of societal dystrophy; it is the antidote. It is a social stabiliser that allows believers to reconnect to values that are fast being lost in today's ever more materialistic and self-centred world.

11. What does Malaysia have to do to ensure that it continues to be successful at nation building? Psychologists say that our short-term memory can only hold seven items. Let me outline seven guidelines that I think will have to be borne in mind in future national building efforts.

12. First, Malaysians of all races, religions, and geographic locations need to believe beyond a shadow of a doubt that they have a place under the Malaysian sun. Only when each citizen believes that he or she has a common home and is working towards a common destiny, will he or she make the sacrifices needed for the long haul. In Malaysia, the Federal Constitution, the Rukun Negara and Vision 2020 encapsulate the rights, hopes and aspirations of the population in a way that no other documents do. The integrity of these documents must be defended and promoted, especially the first.

13. Second, when we seek solutions to problems in nation building, we must be careful not to assume away problems. Nation building is required precisely because there are stark differences within society. If we all walked, talked and thought the same, it would probably not be needed. There will therefore be chauvinistic groups in this country, just as there are in others. They will fight the idea of national unity, block social change and try to be politically dominant. The existence of these groups, however, does not mean that nation building is a futile exercise. It does mean that we must be prepared to negotiate our way through and around these differences. We can, for example, create social movements that aim to enlighten and dissuade popular support being given to them.

14. Third, nation building requires accommodation and compromise. In our haste to be prescriptive, we should not be so idealistic that we are incapable of also being practical. We should not allow perfection to be the enemy of the good. Yes, we should seek the best solutions and expect the highest standards of performance. But we should also be prepared to sacrifice some part of our positions for the good of the whole. The virtues of pure self-interest are largely a myth. What seems to be a reality is that individuals end up worse off when they act out of self-interest, as opposed to acting in their collective group interests.

15. Fourth, if nation building is to be successful, enforced solutions must be avoided. Nation building is effectively rendered null and void by coercion or the threat of violence. 'Might' cannot and must not be shown to be 'right'. If solutions cannot be found within the political and social structures, there will be a strong temptation to resort to illegitimate ways and means.

16. Fifth, nation building occurs when society is open, tolerant and forward-looking. So important are these values that they are embedded in Vision 2020's nine strategic challenges, as are those of mature democracy, caring society and innovation. Only by being inclusive and participative can the various sectors of our society be productively engaged. It follows that all forms of extremism, chauvinism, racism and isolationism must be guarded against. They must be soundly sanctioned socially, politically and, if necessary, also legally.

17. Sixth, nation building is a process rather than an outcome. When Malaysia started off 50 years ago, there were no examples to study. There were no manuals to follow. Mistakes were made and, to a greater or lesser extent, lessons have been learned. While a sense of impatience is perhaps fully understandable, nation building takes place over a period of time and only with persistence. Where there is no trust, trust has to be built. Where there is no cooperative network, one has to be established. Building on layers of foundation is the only way to ensure that the process is solid and sustainable.

18. Seventh, the political, social and economic incentives must reward good behaviour and penalise bad. I know that this statement is virtually self-evident, but it is a fact that many countries are as likely to punish good behaviour as to reward it. After all, if there are benefits for corruption, then there is a real cost to being honest. The incentives for building up a nation must be greater and more compelling than breaking it down. The price of racial and cultural intolerance must be made prohibitively high.

Ladies and Gentlemen:

19. I believe fostering national unity is the responsibility of every Malaysian. However, schools, institutions of higher learning and sports centers have a very special role to play. This is because the sense of national unity is best inculcated in the young. Through textbooks, sports and interaction, educators should eliminate ethnic stereo-types. Through the imaginative teaching of the history of Islamic, Chinese and Indian civilisation, educators could foster greater understanding among different ethnic groups.

20. It is said that it takes a village to raise a child. I believe this is true. To me the village comprises three main institutions - family, school and community. From birth we should be taught to respect and honour each other's culture and heritage. Learning to interact with others is part of this process. Playing with children of other races on the play ground and in friends' homes, we learn to go beyond the colour lines early in life. In school we should be taught about other cultures and beliefs under the same roof as others of different ethnic groups - once again cutting through the colour lines.

Ladies and Gentlemen:

21. I am aware that there are many Malaysians who are deeply troubled at the state of national unity in this country. What I have tried to do today is disabuse you of the notion that there are any 'quick fix' solutions in nation building. If you look closely enough at any country, even ones that are regarded today as highly successful such as Japan, you will find there have been episodes in its past where events were very tenuous. I hope we will do our best to guard against cynicism and hopelessness. And I hope we will all stay the course. Failure, may I remind you all, is a costly option.

22. I wish all speakers, facilitators and participants a constructive and fulfilling day ahead.

Thursday, March 29, 2007

The Singapore Great Strategy To Brain Gain - Absorbing Malaysian and Chinese Talents!



大马及中国移民变身新加坡政经精英 .林友顺

国会议员丶卫生部长丶电视台主播丶国家队乒乓球主将丶福布斯富豪排行榜人选……新加坡的政治丶经济丶社会精英,越来越多大马和中国的华人移民,充分展现新加坡求才若渴及成功的人才战略。新加坡最近公布新的国家发展方略,是从当前的四百五十万人口增加至六百五十万人,因而加速吸纳大量外来精英。

新加坡为了在全球化的战场上争得一席之地,将主要战略放在人才培养和竞争上。近月,新加坡政府公布至二零三零年的国家发展蓝图,以六百五十万人口的规模来发展,要与纽约丶伦敦等国际大都会看齐。然而,以新加坡目前四百五十万的人口,加上出生率屡屡见低的情况下,要建构国际大都会,最关键的就是招揽外来移民,尤其以具竞争力的华人精英为主。

四十七岁的李美花是新加坡的新贵,她在二零零六年新加坡选举中代表执政的人民行动党上阵,成功当选国会议员。生於马来西亚中部马六甲的李美花,也许从未想过,她会放弃了故乡马来西亚,成为新加坡的公民,并选上九十四位国会议员之一。

从一九六五年建国至今,新加坡一直是移民的国家,而大马华人更是新加坡移民的「传统来源」。李美花在马国的老家是个小乡村,但贫穷阻挡不了她勤奋求学的决心。一九八零年,她考进马国最着名的国立大学——马来亚大学,但大学分配给她的不是她所喜爱的工程系,修读一个月後,她获得新加坡南洋理工大学(南洋理工)录取进入工程系,她毅然离开马大,这个决定改变了她的一生。李美花对亚洲周刊说,她当年是受到爸爸的鼓励而作此决定:「我爸爸当时认为,新加坡的体制是根据成绩与表现作为个人能力评定的准绳,我到了新加坡将会有更好的发挥空间。」

大学毕业後,李美花继续留在新加坡工作丶结婚及组织家庭,随後入籍。李美花并不是唯一来自马国却被新加坡吸纳的政治精英,现任卫生部长许文远丶国会议员伍碧虹同样在马国出生,并在新加坡留学及工作後成为新加坡公民。在目前新加坡四百五十万人口中,近三成人口是外来移民。

新加坡对移民人口的需要非常清晰,为了维持种族比例,马国华人丶中国人及印度人将是新加坡吸引的主要外来人才。《联合早报》高级执行编辑严孟达认为,马国华人基於历史背景丶社会环境,较容易融入新加坡社会。「对於马国人才,新加坡人基本上不会特别意识到他们是『外国人』。」他认为,除非马国政府通过行政措施阻止华人把子女送到新加坡读书,否则新加坡对马国华人人才的需求只会增加不会减少。

除了种族比例,在人才专业分布上,新加坡城市也有仔细考量。掌管人口政策的内政部长黄根成表示,新加坡吸引的人才不一定要拥有博士学位,他们可以是拥有特定技能的人才,如飞机维修员。为了接触最广层面丶遍布世界各地的各类人才,新加坡政府设立网站「联系新加坡」(www.contactsingapore.org.sg),让全球的人才得以从网际世界中了解新加坡的情况。

新加坡政府对吸引马国人才非常积极,除了欢迎马国人才前往工作,甚至派员到马国中小学,提高奖学金吸引马国学生到新加坡求学。座落於马国南部柔佛州的宽柔中学是马国着名的民办华文中学之一,该校办学严谨,创校以来一直是柔佛州华裔子弟求学的第一选择。宽柔中学不仅赢得马国华人社会的尊重,也引起只有一水之隔丶求才若渴的新加坡政府的注意。二零零七年,新加坡仅有的两所国立大学—新加坡国立大学及南洋理工学院从宽柔录取了近二百名优秀生,该校精英班的学生几乎一个不漏的被这两所大学吸走。过去几年,该校每年都有逾百名学生被吸引到新加坡深造。一般估计,到新加坡留学的马国学生,约七成选择留在新加坡工作丶组织家庭,最後变成新加坡的人才。

柔佛不少华族家长也为了让孩子接受高素质教育,不惜花费及舟车劳苦,让孩子从小就每天跨越长堤到新加坡接受教育,新加坡新传媒主播董素华就是其中一人。董素华在小学二年级就开始在新加坡念书,她追述那段日子每天清晨六时就得出门,通过两国拥挤的关卡才能抵达学校。她从小学丶中学到大学都在新加坡完成,大部分时间都是在新加坡度过,她自嘲:「了解新加坡多过了解马来西亚。」她在新加坡国立大学数学系毕业後进入新传媒,虽然当时还保留马国国籍,但公司还是给她充分的机会,并支持她在二零零四年及二零零六年赢得新加坡广播业最高荣耀—红星大奖(最佳新闻播报及时事主持)。董素华的另一半是新加坡公民。她在一九九八年成为新加坡永久居民,四年後入籍新加坡。她对选择成为新加坡公民的解释是:「我的生活重心丶家庭丶工作都在新加坡。」拥有新加坡护照让她更方便出国公干,享有更大的便利。

其实,新加坡从一九六五年建国至今,从未停止从马国吸引人才,而近五年来前往马国搜罗人才更见积极。新加坡政府在马国吸引人才是多管齐下,一方面通过提供「亚细安奖学金」吸引优秀生前往该国深造,近年也在马国各主要城市网罗优学秀生。

居住在马国中部雪兰莪州加影的林玉桦在政府办理的国民中学求学,她在高级教育文凭考试中考获全A优秀的成绩,并是该校成绩最佳的学生。她信心满满向政府申请奖学金出国深造,结果却让她失望。她在吉隆坡举行的教育展中了解各国求学情况时来到新加坡国立大学展览厅,该大学代表在了解她的成绩後当场献议给她奖学金前往新加坡深造。林玉桦感到不解:「我在马国申请奖学金却拿不到,可是我不用申请新加坡却愿意给我奖学金。」

优秀生被拒大学门外

林玉桦的情况并不偶然,只是在这两年阿都拉政府采取较包容的政策才渐有改善,但还有不少华裔优秀生无法获得政府奖学金及被拒於大学门外。在一方面缺乏深造机会,另一方面则积极拉拢的情况下,无数马国华裔学生走向新加坡完成求学梦想,其中以学术资格不受马国政府承认的私立华文中学(独中)最普遍。

周建平是吉隆坡尊孔华文中学的学生,他在高中毕业後与同学一道以高中统一考试成绩参与新加坡国立大学的入学试,结果成功被录取。他表示:「我很希望能留在马国求学,可是我的文凭不被马国政府承认,只好以最接近的新加坡作为选择。」

新加坡不仅希望大马华人前往念书,更希望他们毕业後能在该国工作丶居住,最後入籍成为新加坡公民。为了达到这项目标,新加坡也把吸引人才的眼光放得更远,该国进一步派出代表到马国一些华文小学及中学,挑选优秀的小学生及初级中学学生到新加坡留学,让这些学生在更年少的阶段接触新加坡文化,加强这些学生对新加坡的认同感。陈晓薇今年十三岁,她在新加坡中学念书。每个假期,她都孤身一人乘坐长途巴士回返吉隆坡。陈妈妈表示:「我也不舍得孩子那小就离开家。可是难得新加坡政府提供奖学金让她到当地求学,新加坡的教育素质也很高,为了孩子将来的发展,我多麽不舍也要让她过去。」

英语教学吸引大马人

新加坡的教育体系是以英文为教学媒介语,马国则是以马来文为主要教学媒介语,这成为一些家长把孩子送往新加坡求学的原因之一。新加坡自一九六五年脱离马国独立後,四十二年来两国发展距离越来越远,教育体制也出现差距,导致一些家长为了让孩子接受更好的教育,把孩子从小就送到新加坡求学,其中以与新加坡相邻的新山最明显。每天清晨,天还未亮,新山通往新加坡的长堤,挤满了到新加坡工作和念书的人流车流。

除了大马华人,中国精英也是新加坡国家发展方略主要的吸纳对象。上世纪九十年代新加坡与中国建交後,新加坡对中国移民开放门户,允许中国人到新加坡留学和工作,中国人才成为狮城的主要外来人才之一。新加坡《联合早报》助理编辑主任周兆呈在一九九八年来到新加坡进入国立大学修读硕士学位,隔年进入《联合早报》工作迄今。老家在中国江苏省的周兆呈去年获得新加坡南洋理工大学博士学位,他与同样是来自中国的太太育有一名孩子,目前一家三口皆是新加坡永久居民。周兆呈对亚洲周刊说,当年他是要到国外深造,考虑到新加坡华人多,跟中国人的关系也密切,因此选择居留新加坡。

目前,在新加坡留学的中国学生,从小学到博士生各个阶段的学生总数约达三万人,在新加坡国立大学和南洋理工大学就读并获奖学金的中国学生,则分别有三千馀人和两千六百多人。由於领取大学奖学金需要在新加坡工作六年,因此,这批学生将成为未来新加坡移民的主力军。

新加坡吸引的中国人才主要是企业丶高科技丶体育及华文人才。由於新加坡华文水平不高,为了与中国接轨,新加坡希望其公民能掌握华语文,因此从中国输入大量华语文的人才,周兆呈的太太陈颖拥有徐州师范大学丶新加坡国立大学中文系硕士学位,她目前在新加坡义安理工学院担任中文系讲师,负责培训小学华文教师及华文媒体人才。由於缺乏华文人才,新加坡的媒体,广播及艺人界吸引不少来自中国的人才,优频道前任主播张海杰为新加坡人所熟悉的名字,当前着名艺人郭亮都具有中国背景。

体育一直是新加坡最弱的一环,狮城政府近年来致力於提高体育水平,希望成为区域体育强国,但人口总量不足是它的致命伤。为弥补本身不足,新加坡吸引不少来自中国的体育人才,在国际体坛为新加坡扬名的前任国家乒乓队主力井浚泓,以及当前主力李佳薇都是新加坡从中国挖掘的人才。

中国的高科技人才为致力发展生物科技丶生命科学及研发工作的新加坡提供不少精英,新加坡的区域金融中心也吸引不少中国企业进驻新加坡,以新加坡作为筹集资金开拓中国市场的据点,在这方面最成功的应是新加坡仁恒置地集团的董事局主席锺声坚。

上海移民名列富豪榜

已经入籍新加坡的锺声坚在新加坡的富豪榜上有名,他以新加坡为总部,积极开拓中国房地产,目前其产业计划遍布上海丶南京丶苏州丶天津丶珠海丶成都丶贵阳等长三角丶珠三角丶环渤海经济区以及西部地区。根据美国商业杂志《福布斯》(Forbes)公布最新全球富豪排名榜,从上海移居新加坡的仁恒置地主席兼总裁锺声坚,以十七亿美元的身家,首次上榜,排在全球的第五百八十三位。

马国财经分析机构资本投资董事经理陈鼎武表示,马国华人流失到新加坡是马国的损失:「如果这些华人精英都能留在马国服务,马国的国力将不是今天这种局面,甚至可以与新加坡相提并论。」除非马国政府修改政策,马国华人被新加坡吸引过去似乎是无法避免的事,这在一方面对马国华人是个好事,华人有个可以深造发挥所长的草原,不致於在种种限制的不利情况下衰败下去;不过对马国,那是一个让人伤痛的损失。

吸引外国移民除了是国家人口政策的主要成分之一,也是维持国家竞争力与经济成长的要素。副总理兼内政部长黄根成以美国作为例子,报告显示,美国移民人数较多的州属,就业机会比国家平均水平高。美国国家科学院在一九九七年也向国会提呈报告,指外来移民为美国经济带来一百亿美元的净收益。移民也为美国带来更高的生育率,根据美国移民研究中心的估计,在二零零二年,美国的新生婴儿里有二成三是由移民妈妈所生。

掌管国家人口政策的黄根成表示,美国的经验让新加坡了解到,人力是新加坡的重要及唯一的资源,可是,新加坡没有足够的婴儿,也没有足够的本土人才。他指出,新加坡的晶圆工业在二零零五年制造了一万五千个就业机会,其中八千个是生产线工作,七千个是工程师职务。然而新加坡公民及永久居民只能填补八成高技能的工程师职位及三分一的生产线空缺。

兼任国家人口委员会主席的副总理黄根成指出,新加坡要达到人口替代水平,每年需要六万名婴儿,但是目前每年出生的婴儿只有三万五千六百名,若加上像二零零六年那样成功吸引一万三千二百名外国人成为公民,新加坡仍然需要一万一千二百名外来人才填补缺口。新加坡从二零零一年至零四年批准外来人才成为公民的人数介於七千人,零五及零六年却超过一万人,显示新加坡对人口老化的忧虑。新加坡去年的生育率是一点二四,远比维持人口所需的二点零一的比率来得低,而且这个趋势还是一直往下滑。人力部长兼国防部第二部长黄永宏指出,新加坡人口若如日本每年都下降,那将造成很大的影响,这包括新加坡是否还有能力维持制造业丶国防及防务机构等的运作。

新加坡《联合早报》助理编辑主任周兆呈指出,新加坡吸引外国移民是「现实的必然」。他表示,从历史角度看,新加坡是个移民的国家,吸引外国人才是长期坚持的国策。从经济角度而言,新加坡是高度全球化的都市,新加坡要在各方面领先,单单依靠本土人才还是不够;而现有的新加坡人口也很难支撑兴旺的市场。此外,新加坡是高生活成本的都市,生活压力大导致国民生育率低,加上本身人才流失也多,吸引外国人才将是补充人力资源及维持竞争力的最经济及最快速方式。

周兆呈表示,新加坡吸引的高收入外国人才拥有广泛的人脉,他们将能为新加坡创造商业机会,提升新加坡作为国际商业中心的形象;而拥有特定技能的专业人才则大量填补新加坡的人才缺口,维持经济的动力。

为了配合可能的人口增长,国内各方面的建设也得同步进行。新加坡以六百五十万人口作为至二零三零年国家整体发展的规划指标,意味着在未来二十三年内新加坡人口将增加四成,其中一半将是外来移民。李美花表示,虽然政府并没有订下期限在什时候达到人口六百五十万,但必须为未来的发展领先几步。她指出,为了容纳这六百五十万人,政府必须为房屋建设丶水电供应丶医院学校的盖建及交通运输作好规划。新加坡目前土地面积只有六百九十二平方公里,人口稠密度为每平方公里六千二百零八人,一旦人口增加至六百五十万,人口密度将超越香港,达到每平方公里九千二百多人,成为全球人口第三稠密的国家及地区,仅排在摩纳哥及澳门之後。

新加坡政府也成立由黄根成监督的「新加坡侨民联系署」,加强同在海外留学丶工作及长期居住的新加坡人联系,鼓励这些人返国服务。新加坡统计局估计,至二零零五年,约有十四万三千名新加坡人在海外定居,当局相信这个数字将会越来越高。

除了大马及中国华人精英,新加坡为了吸纳外国人才成为新加坡永久居民,在二零零六年推行一系列新措施,包括改进新移民的申请程式并加强其灵活性和透明度丶推出个人化的就业准证及对外加强宣传新加坡为移民的理想地点。此外,政府也将让符合资格而有经济能力可在新加坡自费居留的外国大学毕业生和外国人有更充裕的时间在新加坡寻找工作。

为了方便在新加坡工作的外国人才成为永久居民或公民,新加坡移民与关卡局设计特别网页,让外国人才上网测试是否符合资格。此外,移民事务官员将化被动为主动,找合格的永久居民面谈,询问他们是否有意愿成为公民。根据以往经验,移民局会发函邀请符合资格的永久居民成为公民。

总理李显龙是新加坡最佳的促销员,他在去年的国庆庆典公开提及在马国出生丶但在二零零五年入籍新加坡的发型师颜天发,指他是新加坡未来应该吸引的人才。颜天发在新加坡工作已有二十三年,初到新加坡时,在发廊当洗发工人,每个月工资只有三十新元(约合二十美元),但他的吃苦精神及勤奋学习,终於让他成为着名的发型师,着名影星章子怡也是他的顾客。若根据新加坡移民局的标准,学历不高的颜天发完全不符合该局的移民标准;他说:「新加坡社会这保守,发型师一般上不被视为专才,我没有想到李总理会注意到我们。」然而李显龙认为,颜天发具备了该国多数人所缺乏的才干与技能,这是新加坡所要的人才。

本地人对移民政策忧虑

然而,新加坡大量与快速引入外来人才的政策也引起本地人民的忧虑,他们担忧外来人才夺走了他们的就业机会与机遇。根据英文《星期日时报》在今年初进行的一项调查,新加坡人对外来人才的出现总体上是持正面态度,但触及外来人才是否会抢走他们的就业机会时,绝大部分受调查者无不表示担忧。

不仅部分新加坡人对政府的移民政策有所疑虑,不少在新加坡留学丶工作的马国人在新加坡居住一段日子後选择返回马国。马国第八电视台主播陈嘉荣就是一个例子。在台湾政治大学新闻系毕业的陈嘉荣於一九九七年到新加坡新传媒担任主播,他指新加坡是一个非常好的吸收经验的地方,可是他脑海中一直有回返马国工作的念头。二零零一年的「九一一」发生後,已经三十岁的陈嘉荣开始思考人生未来:「我担心过了三十一岁再不回来(返马),就没有勇气再回来。」二零零四年电视业生态的转变导致发挥空间受压缩,终於推动他作出决定返马以实现理想。返马後,他与一批相同志向的朋友合力搞培养传播人才的工作。

尽管出现不同声音,但对地狭人少的新加坡来说,以吸纳移民作为国际发展方略的主要环节,已是必走的路。这几年,在新加坡政府积极吸引外来人才的努力下,新加坡社会已开始显现全球化的要素。

二零零五年,每四名新加坡男士中,就有一人迎娶外国新娘;约有七万名外国学生在新加坡求学,政府希望至二零一二年,外国学生人数能增加至十五万。目前,新加坡工艺学院一成的学生及大学五分一的学生是外国人。从二零零零年至零六年,平均每年吸引五万名移民,但新加坡出生的婴儿却只有三万五千五百人。

世界各国都在抢夺人才。到了二零三零年,当新加坡人口达到六百五十万时,这个国家将成为东方的纽约,一个汇集全球精英及专才的移民大都会,估计占总人口一半的外来人才将确保新加坡成为一个具有动力丶活力及创造力的城市花园,花香处处。

Sunday, March 25, 2007

TARC graduate denied entry into police force, from Mkini

TARC graduate denied entry into police force
Bede Hong
Mar 24, 07 5:46pm
Adjust font size:

As a child in the early 1980s, he saw firsthand police at work in fighting off the last remnants of the communist threat in Raub, Pahang.

Several doses of Jackie Chan’s Police Story series later, he decided that his calling is to fight crime and keep the peace.

Unfortunately, after graduating with a degree, Soo Pak Leong is denied his dream despite repeated attempts to sign up.

Now at age 27, he is too old to be considered by the police force.

Soo’s problem was simple - his degree, a Bacher of Science from Tunku Abdul Rahman College (TARC) is not recognised by the Public Service Department.

The department determines academic qualifications that are recognised by the government sector.

“I have a strong urge to join, but the system does not allow me,” Soo told reporters at a press conference at DAP Selangor headquarters in Petaling Jaya today.

Three attempts

While not angry at the government, Soo is “frustrated” and “very very disappointed.”

He has applied three times to join the police, taken his case to numerous departments and had even aired his grievances on radio earlier this year.

His is not an unique case, said DAP Selangor secretary Lau Weng San.

“It’s another disappointing scenario when the government and MCA have been urging the Chinese to join the police force and yet we have this case where Soo was turned down,” he said.

Lau blamed the MCA youth education bureau for not trying hard enough to get Soo into the police force.

TARC was established in 1969 by the MCA. The Chinese-majority party partly funds the college.

Soo’s first applied for the cadet assistant superintendent of police in 2004. He was 24. It was rejected with no reasons given.

He tried again the following year, again with no reply. Before Soo reached the ceiling age of 25, he tried again, this time for the Inspector post.

Disturbing question

This time, Bukit Aman replied and said that his qualifications was not recognised. After further enquiries, the PSD concurred.

Lau said the MCA has to answer one disturbing question. Why are TARC qualifications not recognised by the government. Their graduates used to have great career prospects in the private sector,” said Lau.

Referring to MCA’s attempts to get recognition for degrees from two universities in China, Peking University and Qin Hua University, he said the party should not abandon its college at home when thousands of TARC students are not recognised.

Meanwhile, Soo described his current job, a network engineer, as “so far, so good.”

Asked if he would still join the police force if given the opportunity, he replied, “For sure I would. I know that police work is where I can fully utilise my passion and knowledge.”

“But I just want to let other people know, especially Chinese parents, that if their children want to join the government service, they should go through STPM first and check with the PSD,” he added.