Monday, June 22, 2009

为何马华在过去数十年没有正式向政府申请使用土地为社区中心?

如果马华公会反对政府收回社区中心,为何他们本身没有在过去数十年执政雪州时向州政府正式申请使用这些土地?

最近马华公会大动作反对雪州地方政府收回地方上的社区中心,并且以“社区中心乃由居民本身建立,州政府当时没有涉及在内”等理由反对州政府收回这些中心。

其中一个例子就是安邦太子园社区中心风波,其中马华公会必须劳动总会长翁诗杰本身在媒体上攻击民联。

根据土地法典和联邦宪法,土地属于州政府事务,任何没有获得州政府的批准下私自在政府地兴建建筑物,州政府一律有权收回,甚至拆毁有关建筑物。这一点翁诗杰作为联邦部长不可能不明白。

既然土地拥有权归州政府,那么民联州政府和市议会要收回有关中心是天经地义的事、马华公会和有关非政府组织不能罪怪他人,反之必须反省为何当初没有堂堂正正地正式向土地局申请这些土地?

难道当初马华公会以为他们能够永远执政,所以无需申请土地拥有权,即使能够获得土地拥有权(地契),马华公会和这些组织必须依法缴付门牌税和地税。

其实,民联州政府收回这些中心并不是新鲜事。此指令早在去年就已经颁布给各县市议会和各县土地局。这些中心大多挂上马华的党徽,证明马华霸占政府土地。

如果这些民众会堂建在民众会堂保留地,那么州政府将会保留建筑物,开放出租给所有人士使用。

翁诗杰批评民联把民众会堂交还给人民的意思就是交给“州政府扶持的村委会”。这种说法显示翁诗杰的无知,因为并不存在所谓的“州政府扶持的村委会”,因为州政府所承认的村委会只有一个,联邦政府本身设立的村委会比没有法定地位。所以翁诗杰的抨击根本没有立足点。

1 comment:

NEO said...

MCA did apply but their application were all rejected!

Being a component party of BN, MCA could not admit that they have failed in all these land application. Thus, a close door meeting were arrange between the Umno and MCA. The outcome is the Umno lead BN governmrnt has implemented "Tutup 1 Mata" policy.

Now the situation has change. Selangor has fall into Pakatan. And MCA is having a big problem to continue the "Tutup 1 Mata" policy.

Actually, Pakatan ADUN is not so "smart". The issue here is very simple!

Refer to "Akta Tanah". MCA must proof to the general public that there are the legal owner of the land! Show us the S&P or latter of Award from the land office. If MCA failed to deliver these evident, this mean MCA is hidding at the back of NGO's to build "illegal structure" on the lands that these MCA lead NGO's that they do not own.

It is not the issues of who finance the building of these "illegal structure" but it is related to the ownership of lands.

If MCA claimed that what did by these MCA lead NGO's i.e. building illegal structure on other people land is justifiable, then everybody will not buying land but start building houses, factory and other building structure on land which is not occupy!

So, go back to "Akta Tanah" and check with Lnad Office!

Who control these NGO's at "安邦太子园社区中心". A search at ROS will provide the answer.

I have send me guy to conduct a search. The report will be out this Thursday. Then, look at the list of Pengerusi and Ahli Jawatan Kuasa" Are they any MCA members? majority are MCA members? What are the activities organised by these NGO's? Zero activities? Sleeping NGO's? Where are the source of funding for these NGO's?

In summary, MCA has fail to obtained approval on land application for comunity project even MCA is a 50 years partner in BN. But MCA could not let the general public know about their weaknesses. Thus, under the good co-operation spirit of BN, the "Tutup 1 Mata" policy were establish.

MCA is not encouraging people to build illegal structure on land that we did not own. Shall we support this illegal act?

Perhap OTK should answer.

Dear YB,

Please consult with the Mr. Speaker and quote the relevent sectiuon of "土地法典"