Please click "Google Ad" on top to support this blog. Thank you!
PEJABAT TUAN SPEAKER DEWAN NEGERI SELANGOR
TINGKAT 1, WISMA DEWAN NEGERI SELANGOR, 40680, SHAH ALAM, SELANGOR.
TEL: +60355447616
EMAIL: lauwengsan@gmail.com
https://linktr.ee/lauwengsan
Office hour: 8am to 5pm (Monday to Friday)
Tuesday, December 11, 2007
Watch Bung Mokhtar Radin stunt show in Parliament
Please click "Google Ad" on top to support this blog. Thank you!
Monday, December 10, 2007
Ka Siong in cronic denial syndrome
Please click "Google Ad" on top to support this blog. Thank you!
I am very disappointed with his speech and I totally cannot understand why he needs to stand up and reject this motion if this job can be done by his counterparts when he is generally considered by members of the public as an MP who "speaks his conscience" while this clip is best to expose his true face.
Some of his arguments are unaccepted i.e. he claimed that the criminal are released in court because DAP lawyers represented them in the court without knowing the facts that it is always the failure of the AG-Chambers to do their job probably before they attend the courthouse, more so not all the criminals are represented by DAP lawyers!
Wild accusations thrown at Teresa
Please click "Google Ad" on top to support this blog. Thank you!
This is a wild and baseless accusation when BN MPs failed to argue well on certain issues.
Power-abuse by Rela must be seriously looked into but BN MPs seemed to be heavily plagued by denial syndrome to even go to the extend of accusing the oppositions as not loving this country when oppositions exposed the wrongs and rot in this country.
Kit Siang lends support to charged Bersih leaders, lawyers
Please click "Google Ad" on top to support this blog. Thank you!
Cabinet urged to heed Musa's call
Please click "Google Ad" on top to support this blog. Thank you!
Former Deputy Prime Minister and the first Suhakam Chairman, Tun Musa Hitam, has provided a solution to prevent the country plunging down the slope of a new "dark age" for human rights, democracy and the rule of law.
In an interview with Sunday Times, Musa has made an eloquent call for Malaysia to be one of the first developing nations to show respect for the human right of freedom of expression by allowing peaceful assemblies and demonstrations.
Asked "Is Malaysia ready for peaceful assemblies", Musa gave the refreshing and confident reply: "Yes, Come on, we have been independent for 50 years."
Musa is right when he made two important points, which should be serious thought by the Prime Minister and Cabinet on Wednesday.
Firstly, the fallacy of equating "demonstrations" with "violence".
Musa rightly pointed out that Malaysia should move forward and away from the mentality equating "demonstrations" with "violence", and he made proposals for peaceful demonstrations to be allowed by the government, with the responsibility for ensuring that the demonstrations are peaceful also being placed on the organizers.
Secondly, Musa's rebuttal of the repeated TV claim and dismissal of demonstrations as "Ini bukan budaya kita" (This is not our culture).
Musa said: "I'm sorry for ridiculing this, but where is there a budaya (culture of violence) anywhere in the country? Do you think violence is a French budaya? Indonesians? Filipinos?"
150 attended Human Right candle light vigil
Please click "Google Ad" on top to support this blog. Thank you!
A government angry with hungry people
Please click "Google Ad" on top to support this blog. Thank you!
He urged the government to listen the angry voice of the hungry and not to turn to be angry with hungry people.
Will women vote for sexist MPs?
请点击上面的“谷歌广告”以示对此博客的支持。谢谢!Please click "Google Ad" on top to support this blog. Thank you!
JAG or Joint Action Group for Gender Equality is usging the public not to vote for sexist MPs and asked political parties not to field them as candidate.
JAG's urges was published in the NST dated 9th December 2007.
What I wonder is if these sexist candidates manage to make their way up to represent their parties for the coming general election, what will other do, especially those who support the parties of these sexist candidates or are working with them?
Shall you vote for them too?
A vote for BN is certainly a vote for yes to sexist MPs, if they are the candidates for BN.
A stand is a stand. No to sexist MPs means "
It is as simple as that.
===========================
Don’t vote for sexist reps, says group
PETALING JAYA: The Joint Action Group for Gender Equality is urging the public not to vote for members of parliament who make sexist remarks and asked political parties not to field them as candidates.
The umbrella coalition of several women organisations — All Women’s Action Society (Awam), Sisters In Islam, Women’s Aid Organisation, Pusat Janadaya, Women’s Development Collective and Women’s Centre for Change — has been monitoring sexist comments made by MPs.
Awam executive director Honey Tan said: “Sexist remarks are not jokes. They are offensive and distasteful. They demean and devalue women.”
She said that the group had met Minister in Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz and Parliament Speaker Tan Sri Ramli Ngah Talib in July to express its disapproval about derogatory comments made by MPs.
“We have no confidence in MPs who do not respect women, and we will urge voters not to vote for them,” said Tan.
The group will send a list of MPs who had made sexist remarks to political parties soon.
Sunday, December 09, 2007
谴责警方践踏人权
请点击上面的“谷歌广告”以示对此博客的支持。谢谢!Please click "Google Ad" on top to support this blog. Thank you!
我在今日上午接到消息,指其中一名被指曾经参与公选盟和平请愿的人士,Muhammad Harith Fathilah bin Shahabudin在今日上午在其位于Taman Maluri的住家遭警方以警察法令的逮捕令下遭逮捕,并且已经在金马警区总部扣留24小时。
Muhammad Harith Fathilah bin Shahabudin将会在明天上午8时半被带往吉隆坡大使路推事庭过庭。
目前还不知道警方将会在什么法令下把Muhammad Harith Fathilah bin Shahabudin控上法庭。
Muhammad Harith Fathilah bin Shahabudin的胞兄Muhammad Taufik bin Shahabudin也在现场向我表示,警方在当天在逮捕Masjid Jamek逮捕24名被指参与公选盟和平请愿活动的人士。这些人士都在当天释放。
Muhammad Harith Fathilah bin Shahabudin就是其中一名被警方无理逮捕的人士。
雪州行动党强力谴责警方的压迫性逮捕行动。这也证明警方无法落实皇家警方调查委员会报告书的建议,那就是大马皇家警察部队应该转型成为一支尊重人权的世界级警察部队。
另外,对于警方以神经敏感的压迫方式来处理今日上午举行的另一场配合“世界人权日”举行的“自由行”游行,并逮捕5名律师和3名人权活跃分子,雪州行动党严厉谴责警方的行动。
集会自由是我国联邦宪法赐予每一名国民的基本人权。联邦宪法也说明,任何和邻邦宪法相冲突的条文和法令都被视为无效。因此,警方不能每次都以警察法令(即没有获得警方准证为由)来阻止人民进行合法、合情、合宪以及合理的和平市委、集会和请愿活动。
警方应该立即无条件释放今天早上被扣留的人士以及Muhammad Harith Fathilah bin Shahabudin!
关注周美芬病情,望早日康复
请点击上面的“谷歌广告”以示对此博客的支持。谢谢!Please click "Google Ad" on top to support this blog. Thank you!
妇女、家庭与社会发展部政务次长拿汀巴杜卡周美芬今午前往关丹聆听林明水灾汇报会途中,在东海岸大道第196.4公里处发生意外,受伤入院。
周美芬所乘坐的官车抵达车祸地点时,轿车在雨中失控先撞分界堤,然后整辆汽车翻转后撞至对面的反方向道路。
据知,周美芬在救伤车内睡在病床上,并须要借助氧气筒呼吸,送抵时全身浴血,未能说话。彭亨州士满慕区州议员彭子明前往急症室了解周美芬的情况后向记者表示,周美芬情况稳定,不过一切须待医生检查后才知晓。
出事车内的其他3人是周美芬的司机尤斯里、机要秘书蔡凤玲及志工团团员何立坚,他们也在车祸中受伤,尤斯里在送往医院时乘坐轮椅,嘴唇破裂。
本人代表雪州行动党和八打灵火箭行动队对周美芬的病情深表关注,并且希望她能够早日康复。
Pak Lah lied!

Please click "Google Ad" on top to support this blog. Thank you!
I was totally surprised by PM’s words that this country practiced power sharing theory and his understanding about his cabinet ministers line up.
This is what he said in Penang as reported by the Star:
PENANG: If Malaysia practised genocide or apartheid, half the Cabinet would not be filled with non-Muslims, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi said.
“When Hindraf said we carried out genocide, its allegation was a sign of evil. Please think about the Cabinet.
“Half of it is non-Malays, non-Umno members and non-Muslims,” he said at a press conference at the IMT-GT SME Conference & Expo 2007 here yesterday.
He said the Cabinet would not follow the Government if such atrocities were being practised.
“You think they (the Cabinet) would go with the government and allow themselves to be associated with it? Tak masuk akal (This does not make sense),” he said, referring to a front-page article in a foreign newspaper that claimed Malaysia was practising apartheid against Hindus.
Abdullah said only those who did not know the real situation would be hoodwinked….
The PM said that half of the Cabinet ministers are non-Malays, non-UMNO members and non-Muslims.
Well, just take a look at the Cabinet line-up yourself at the Prime Minister Office website.
Do a tabulation. You can find out that 69% or 22 out of the 32 cabinet ministers are from UMNO, 23 out of 32 cabinet ministers are Malay, 25 out of 32 ministers are bumiputera and 23 cabinet ministers are Muslims.
It seems that Pak Lah does not even know who are his cabinet ministers!
Saturday, December 08, 2007
New licensing fees withdrawn
Please click "Google Ad" on top to support this blog. Thank you!
DAP Selangor submitted a petition to the Selangor Menteri Besar Khir Toyo demanding the state government to withdraw the new ruling to unify commercial licensing fees in all local municipalities in Selangor which resulted in huge hike of licensing fees for the traders.
We succeeded in pushing the state government to withdraw the ruling.
Kudus to DAP!
Details of mainstream media report is available here, here, here and here.
Another RM10 salary cut - This time it's PM
Please click "Google Ad" on top to support this blog. Thank you!
While the first position gives him the power to guard the country's financial performancem, the latter gives him power to control the biggest security force in Malaysia - The Royal Malaysian Police Force.
Lately, there have been grievances that Abdullah cannot perform well as he is holding too many ministerial positions that have caused the Police's failure in curbing crime, the primary duty of police in Malaysia.
YB Fong Po Kuan, MP for Batu Gajah will table a motion to cut Abdullah's salary as Minister of Internal Security for not being to bring advancement to social security in Malaysia.
Chien Jen: Malaysian universities are little police states
Please click "Google Ad" on top to support this blog. Thank you!
DAP MP for Bandar Kuching YB Chong Chien Jen claimed that universities in Malaysia are like little police states.
Friday, December 07, 2007
10-ringgit-cut motion against ZAM
Please click "Google Ad" on top to support this blog. Thank you!
10-ringgit-cut motion against ZAM #1 (video clips to be viewed in sequence)
10-ringgit-cut motion against ZAM #2
Due to some technical difficulties, for clips #3 to #7, please visit here, here, here, here and here
The House was heated up again two days ago when Parliamentary Opposition Leader YB Lim Kit Siang moved a ten-ringgit-cut motion against Information Minister, Datuk Zainuddin Maidin, who is best known as Zam.
According to Kir Siang, Zainuddin Maidin as a former top journalist should have blazed the path and expanded space for greater media freedom. Instead he has done the reverse.
He said that it is Zam as Information Minister who presented the public face of the Barisan Nasional government of such media control.
“In fact, he is the Barisan Nasional ideologue for media control and censorship.”
Kit Siang also mentioned that Zam is the “Predator of the Press” as the government’s chief hatchet man to suppress press freedom in the country, instead of being awarded Tokoh Kewartawanan last year.
Kit Siang’s motion drawn huge reaction from BN backbenchers and Zam who was also present during the motion also responded mischievously against Kit Siang.
Among other things that Kit Siang has brought up is Zam’s power abuse by misusing state machinery to demonize him in RTM website.
These are a series of seven video clips which should be view in sequence for you to watch the whole 65-minute debate exchange between Kit Siang, BN Backbenchers and Zam over the motion.
Wednesday, December 05, 2007
Suspended UPM student takes case to Parliament
Please click "Google Ad" on top to support this blog. Thank you!
Two student groups have backed suspended Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) student Lee Song Yong's bid to get the decision overturned with the help of members of Parliament. They met YB Lim Kit Siang at a press conference and a RM10 salary cut on Higher Education Minister Mustapa Mohamed.
Malaysian Students Solidarity president Sheikh Omar Ali and Malaysia Youth and Students Democratic Movement (Dema) administration secretary Simon Ooi led a group of students to Parliament House where they also held a press conference today.
Lee said their objective was to get the MPs to sign a protest memorandum to be submitted to Higher Education Minister Mustapa Mohamad.
"We are just hoping that Tok Pa (Mustapa) will intervene in the matter and cancel the suspension," he said.
By the end of the day, the group has obtained 19 signatures from the MPs - all of whom are from the opposition camp.
A number of government MPs were approached but they declined to ink the petition, including Chor Chee Heung (MCA-Alor Star) (photo, far left) and Shahrir Abdul Samad (Umno-Johor Baru).
Lee, a second-year student, was charged with refusal to cooperate with university security officials and obstructing them from performing their duties.
Following disciplinary proceedings, he received a one-semester suspension. This effectively means that he may have to spend an additional year to complete his three-year degree in computer science.
The protest memorandum demands that the campus authorities revoke the suspension immediately, clearly state procedures to be followed by security guards, and act against the security officers who abused their power.
Asked if he had appealed to the ministry, Lee said: "I only received the grounds of the decision of the disciplinary proceedings yesterday and we're in the midst of submitting an application. At the same time, we are here to garner support from MPs."
Sheikh Omar said Lee's suspension was unreasonable as it is only the fourth stage penalty as stated in the Universities and University Colleges Act (UCCA).
"The fifth stage is expulsion. It is ridiculous to hand down a one-semester suspension when he had only refused to let the security guards check his bag," he said, adding that he hopes for a positive response from Mustapa.
Parliamentary Opposition leader Lim Kit Siang, who was present at the press conference, described the suspension as "harsh, high-handed, undemocratic and arbitrary".
"It is regrettable that Mustapa has not intervened in this issue. Also regrettable is Deputy Minister Ong Tee Kiat's announcement that the government will introduce university autonomy. It cannot be introduced until the UCCA is abolished," Lim said.
"The Higher Education Ministry cannot pass the buck to the universities. I hope Mustapa will intervene and revoke the suspension."
UPM has seen a series of skirmishes between students and the authorities, particularly in the run-up to campus elections each year.
Kit Siang announced RM10 cut on Zam's salary
Please click "Google Ad" on top to support this blog. Thank you!
Lim Kit Siang announced that he will table a motion to cut the salary of Information Minister Datuk Zainuddin Maidin, who is known as Zam, by RM10 in censuring him for his ministerial failure to promote press freedom in Malaysia.
Zainuddin or Zam is also censured for sacking seven Minnal FM staffs. Minnal FM is a state-owned Tamil radio station and the sacked DJs are alleged to have supported the recent Hindraf rally.
Boneless Devamany criticised
Please click "Google Ad" on top to support this blog. Thank you!
Tuesday, December 04, 2007
Revive local government election
Please click "Google Ad" on top to support this blog. Thank you!
The decision has draw huge disagreement from the North Perak Chinese Chamber as the decision is not business-friendly.
On a larger note, such decision can only come out from the local council as it lacks accountability when its councillors are appointed and not elected.
Removal of cross and demolition of Christian statutes in mission schools
Please click "Google Ad" on top to support this blog. Thank you!
I don't have to say much here. Please visit here and here.
Or you can go to the Parliament's website to download the hansard of the day when UMNO MP for Parit Sulung made the remarks on 29th October 2007. The extract of the remarks are as follow:
Tuan Syed Hood bin Syed Edros [Parit Sulong]: …Tuan Yang di-Pertua, saya ingin menyentuh satu perkara tentang Kementerian Pelajaran iaitu sekolah-sekolah mubaligh seperti Convent, La Salle, Methodist dan sebagainya. Saya difahamkan Lembaga Pengarah di sekolah-sekolah ini sebahagiannya ditadbir dari gereja-gereja di luar negara seperti di Vatican City. Saya juga difahamkan permohonan untuk membina surau di sebahagian sekolah-sekolah ini terpaksa mendapat kebenaran daripada Lembaga Pengarah yang mana Lembaga Pengarah ini sebahagiannya ditadbir oleh gereja.
Jadi amat memalukanlah, bagi diri saya, tentang pentadbiran sekolah-sekolah ini yang masih lagi dikawal oleh pihak gereja. Begitu juga saya difahamkan tentang iklim sekolah-sekolah tersebut, banyak ibu bapa Islam menghantar anak-anak mereka ke sana, mereka kompelin sebab ada kalanya sekolah dimulakan dengan lagu-lagu gereja. Ini saya tidak tahu benar atau tidak, tetapi ia apa yang saya dapat daripada ibu bapa sendiri tetapi yang jelas di sekolah-sekolah ini terpampang simbol-simbol agama. Saya rasa kecewa di dalam negara Islam, Malaysia ini, kalau saya pergi ke sekolah convent, ada terpampang patung St. Mary di depandepan sekolah convent...
Datuk Haji Mohamad bin Haji Aziz [Sri Gading]: [Bangun]
Tuan Syed Hood bin Syed Edros [Parit Sulong]: Silakan Yang Berhormat bagi Sri Gading.
Timbalan Yang di-Pertua [Datuk Dr. Yusof bin Yacob]: Ya, Yang Berhormat bagi Sri Gading.
Datuk Haji Mohamad bin Haji Aziz [Sri Gading]: Bagi saya sudah tidak terkejut, Yang Berhormat bagi Parit Sulong, cerita ini... [Disampuk] Bukan soal biasa. Soalnya kenapa boleh berlaku seperti ini? Satu. Hari Raya yang lepas, saya diberitahu oleh seorang bapa, waktu Aidilfitri disambut, sekolah jenis-jenis ini tidak ditutup. Terima kasih.
Tuan Syed Hood bin Syed Edros [Parit Sulong]: Bukan sahaja patung, tetapi Ahli-ahli Yang Berhormat pergilah, tengoklah salib Kristian diletakkan di depan-depan sekolah. Saya tidak faham Kementerian Pelajaran, adakah pegawai-pegawai tidak nampak atau memang dasar kita membenarkan perkara ini. Walau bagaimanapun, saya sebagai orang yang bertanggungjawab kepada diri saya, agama, bangsa dan tanah air ini, saya menyatakan pendirian saya bahawa patung-patung ini hendaklah dirobohkan, salib-salib ini hendaklah dimusnahkan dan pengaruhpengaruh gereja di sekolah-sekolah ini hendaklah dihentikan. Begitu juga dana yang dikumpulkan di sekolah-sekolah ini. Adakah kita mendapat laporan? Kalau boleh kementerian mendedahkan dana sekolah-sekolah ini. Saya difahamkan ada sekolah-sekolah ini juga ditaja oleh pihak-pihak gereja. Dana-dananya datang daripada gereja-gereja dan adakah pihak kementerian pantau sumber-sumbernya? Adakah audit-audit dilaksanakan?
"Sekolah bantuan penuh" and "Sekolah bantuan modal" - Why the difference?
Please click "Google Ad" on top to support this blog. Thank you!
SJKC Ladang Harcroft debated
Please click "Google Ad" on top to support this blog. Thank you!
Lim Kit Siang stood up during the winding up session for Ministry of Education to ask why there has not been any policy from the government to build new SKs, SJKCs and SJKTs wherever there is a need in a community.
Deputy Minister in-charge to winding for his own Ministry, YB Noh Omar did not directly answer the question.
Gerakan MP for Puchong, Lau Yan Peng jumped into the gun to undermine the Opposition.
Kit Siang also question the need to use back the same name and asked why the school could not be named after a famous Chinese Educationist Lim Lian Geok, who is a local rather than a foreign name which nobody can recognise.
Kit Siang asked for "Zero Negligence"
Please click "Google Ad" on top to support this blog. Thank you!
What we can see here is a classical display of denial syndrome and mentality by the Deputy Minister by claiming that the public still hold high reliance on government hospitals when people are still coming to government hospitals to seek for medical assistances.
Abdul Latif even claimed that when we can see a lot of people lining up waiting to be attended, that shows that the people are confident with government hospitals.
Negligence in public hospital slammed
Please click "Google Ad" on top to support this blog. Thank you!
This is his speech during the committee stage of the debate for Ministry of Health.
GCC's Charles Santiago spoke on Hindraf
Please click "Google Ad" on top to support this blog. Thank you!
Groups of Concerned Citizens' Charles Santiago, M. Manogar and Arumugam spoke on the recent Hindraf rally for equal treatment against minority ethnic Indians in Malaysia.
Warning from speaker, but does he know what happened?
Please click "Google Ad" on top to support this blog. Thank you!
Speaker of Dewan Rakyat YB Tan Sri Ramli Ngah yesterday made a long 'opening speech' and giving his 'warning' to MPs by citing the incident on last Thursday when Deputy Speaker Datuk Lim Si Cheng stopped DAP MP from Seputeh, YB Teresa Kok, from speaking during the Committee Stage debate on the Federal Territory Ministry.
Tan Sri Ramli Ngah expressed regret that Teresa Kok had argued with Lim Si Cheng when he stopped her from speaking. He said that it is the right of the Speaker to limit the speaking time of MPs, especially when the Dewan Rakyat already behind schedule. He mentioned Teresa Kok (Seputeh) and said that she shouldn't have brought the incident out of the Dewan Rakyat and cast aspersion against Lim Si Cheng. He also said that the word 'you' or 'awak' and 'me' or 'saya' should not be used in the debate, but MPs should refer or call each other according to constituency name. He said he hoped such an incident would not happen again.
I am not quite agreeable with the remarks from the Speaker as although it is the Speaker's discretion to limit or even stop MPs from continuing their speeches, Speaker can only do that when the MP is swaying away from his or her speech from the original topic.
As for Teresa Kok's case, I stand by her insistence to continue speaking as it was Federal Territory Ministry which was on debate and Teresa was one of the few Federal Territory MPs who wanted to participate in the debate.
The ministry itself is not a big Ministry and priority should be given to FT MPs who have no councilors or state assemblymen/women in their constituency.
I was informed by Teresa's blog that she has prepared a speech of about two pages, which is not very long and can be fully delivered in five minutes.
You can read more in Teresa's blog.
Saturday, December 01, 2007
印裔族群社会问题严峻
整体来说,这篇社论以精简的方式到处马来西亚印裔社群所面对的困境。
虽然部分文章是为了符合官方论述而撰写(红色部分),但是这不失为一篇真实反映印裔社群困境的文章。
南洋社论:印裔族群社会问题严峻 2007/11/30 18:23:05
●南洋商报
我国印度裔族群长期存在的社会问题和所面对之困境,近日甚嚣尘上,引起首相拿督斯里阿都拉之关注,训示国大党主席拿督斯里三美威鲁尽速成立特别委员会,来研究有关该族群诉求之完整报告,以呈交予内阁深入讨论。
作为我国第三大族群,印裔一直宣称日渐被“边缘化”,使到印社问题层面日益扩大与复杂,首相在印裔表达不满声浪日渐强烈之际,适时指示国大党深入研究问题实况,并探讨适当步骤来逐步改善印裔在政经文教等领域的处境,显示政府已更关注印裔民众的心声与困境。
印裔先辈和华裔族群一样,于百多年前陆续被英国人引入马来亚,参与开发建设工作。印度人主要从事园丘种植与兴建修筑铁路与公路的劳动工作,他们克苦耐劳、工作认真,长期默默付出,为我国铁路与公路网络之完善发展,以及橡胶和棕油等种植业的迅速起飞,奠下稳固的基础,贡献巨大。
印裔先辈重视子女教育,独立初期,不少印度人在医药、司法、学术等专业领域表现杰出,时至今日亦然,不过,随着国家经济迅速发展,加上大部分印裔仍是居住在卫生、基本建设与资讯皆落后的园丘,印裔之竞争力已是今非昔比,一代不如一代,成为在政经文教育领域的弱势族群,单在经济领域里,印裔占有率便从早期的3.75%,剧降至目前的仅约1
%。
印裔散居于园丘与郊外,居住环境不象华人新村般人口密集,适合从事各类小生意和耕种等经济活动,有机会培养出有能力到大城市发展的工商领域人才,以及接受良好的教育,种种因素促使大部分印度人生活在贫穷水平,不易摆脱困境。
印社问题日趋棘手,非朝夕能改变,除工商领域落后外,印裔也不易进入公共服务领域和国立大专学府,令到年轻印裔傍徨无助,心生失望与不满;到大城市谋生的印裔青年,备受昂贵生活水准所冲击,在贫富悬殊之情况下,印裔青年更觉失落无助,心理不易平衡,遂衍生高犯罪率与自杀率等问题。
工商界大量聘请外劳,加剧印裔青年的失业率,我国外劳人数已近200 万人,加上约30余万名非法外劳,其总人数其实已超越人口仅约200万之印裔族群。大批失业印裔公民埋怨公共及私人领域把印裔排挤于外,使他们与马来人及华裔之间的收入与经济鸿沟扯远,私人企业在这方面,亦须重视有关现象,与其耗钱费时聘请外劳,何不舍远取近,吸纳印裔?
印社问题千丝万缕,短期不易解决,一些问题华社亦感同身受,并曾一再疾呼政府一视同仁,公平对待各族。政府须配合国内外时局大趋势,以加速落实各领域发展大计为重,不分肤色与文化背景,更开明和开放的吸纳各族人才协助建设与发展国家。
无论如何,印裔社群的诉求与怒吼,皆须在法律范围内理性进行,切勿挑起足以导致种族与宗教间磨擦敌视之敏感问题,应避免采用暴力和破坏公物的非和平示威行动,以确保各族先贤们艰辛建起之和谐团结、谅解包容精神长存,让各族共同为落实国家发展宏愿,齐心协力作出贡献。
治安败坏,强奸猖獗——政府不能充耳不闻!
Don't forget to click "Google Ad" on top to support this blog. Thank you!
首相署部长拿督麦西慕昨天向媒体透露说,国内强奸案逐年增加,今年首9 个月总共发生2千432 起强奸案,跟去年同时期1 千849 起宗比较,增加31.5%,平均每天发生8 至9 起!
麦西慕说,70% 的强奸案是相识者所干的,显示家庭和社会环节出了问题。“还有就是70%的受害者都在18岁以下。
政府公布的数字显示在过去4年政府因无法正确和专业地管理警察部队的各项问题,包括人力不足的问题,导致罪案率直线上升。
大部分罪案的直接和间接受害者为弱势族群,尤其是女性。罪案,尤其是强奸案,更是对各年龄层女性的一大威胁。
在2003年,我国每天有三名女性被强奸。这个数字在2006年高涨至每天6.7个人。到了今年首九个月,这个数目竟然已经飙升至9个人。这再再显示虽然政府在过去9个月着手处理治安败坏的问题,包括加强警察部队的人力分配和器材供应,政府的努力显然没有达到预期的效果。
其实除了强奸案,妇女面对的治安问题还包括一般的抢劫、攫夺、偷窃、破门行窃的案件。至于强奸案,许多非政府组织的调查显示,在每一宗向警方投报的强奸案之中,就有至少三宗强奸案是没有向警方投报的。所以,我们有理由相信我国每天不幸遭强奸的女性现在已经超过9人!
如果美国洛杉矶2006年因为平均每2天发生3宗强奸案就已经成为女性不宜居住的地方,那么马来西亚岂不是成为一个对女性高度危险的国家?
我呼吁政府和警察部队能够抛弃他们的否定症候群,着手处理治安败坏的问题,严重看待,为何经过一连串的努力,国内的治安和强奸案依然未见好转。
Friday, November 30, 2007
DAP leaders speak on Hindraf and Pak Lah in Jenjarum dinner
Thursday, November 29, 2007
Land snap by UMNO, Ministry no answers!
There was another exchange today when DAP MP for Cheras, Tan Kok Wai raise the question of land snap by UMNO Cheras Division to build their division headquarters in an open space which belongs to the government without obtaining any approval from Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL).
Kok Wai was very furious as the deputy minister replied on behalf of his ministry, the MP from Masjid Tanah refuse to answer as he claimed that the matter is not under the portfolio of his ministry.
Do you believe what he say when matters pertaining to DBKL are directly under his portfolio and such blatant land snap by UMNO and erection of illegal structures are directly under the jurisdiction of DBKL?
Stop the rot! Stop the patronage!
双溪威新村综合广场计划——市政厅须依据程序行事
甘榜东姑区州议员黄世豪医生和八打灵再也北区国会议员周美芬数周之前曾经召开一项记者会,召集双溪威新村综合广场计划发展商Taipan Focus私人有限公司和双溪威华小家教协会等人出席一项汇报会,澄清发展商已经针对双溪威新村综合广场的原本计划做出修改。
有关类似独立广场的综合广场计划的原本图测是把3层楼高的大楼建立在草场前面,现在发展商决定把大楼建在草场之后。
这项综合广场计划将建有双层停车场,广场内据说设有儿童游乐场、健康走道、室内足球场、篮球场、小贩中心以及商店。
本人曾经针对这项计划在10月下旬前往八打灵再也市政厅查询,发现有关计划发展上尚未把整个发展计划呈上市政厅批准。
本人要交待的是:
1. 这个位于SS9A/1路的草场不仅是双溪威华小学生体育的唯一草场,也是双溪威村民唯一一个大型的草场。这项计划并不是市政厅本身的计划,而是发展商毛遂自荐的计划,市政厅在审核这项计划的时候,务必详细研究,确保没有发生任何涉及利益输送的事件发生。
2. 由于这项计划也涉及草场后面的一片非法木屋地(位于这一带的非法木屋已经在数年前被拆除),而依据八打灵再也发展大蓝图,这片土地是要用来发展成为住宅区,因此若当局把这片土地发展成为一个综合广场(属于商业区),那么这是不符合法律和程序。若要批准这项计划,有关当局必须修改发展大蓝图。
3. 如果要修改大蓝图,市政厅必须召开听证会,要求附近受影响的居民和商家出席听证会,聆听他们的意见。如果大部分居民和商家对发展上的这项计划部标信心,反对这项计划,那么市政厅必须修改发展商的计划。这是法律和程序上的要求。市政厅曾经因为绕过这个重要的程序而在2005年遭一群来自Taman Desa Ria的居民控上法庭。当时的八打灵再也市议会在法庭败诉,导致市议会被迫赔偿居民。
4. 双溪威华小只是其中一个靠近草场的单位。真正能够代表华小的除了家教协会之外就是华小的董事部。迄今,董事部尚未针对这项计划发言。
5. 我也呼吁Taipan Focus履行一家私人企业所应该负起的社会责任,即在双溪威新村公开整份发展计划,让每一位村民能够一目了然地了解有关计划的详情,因为这片草场属于全体双溪威新村村民,也是整个新村唯一一片绿肺。他们自然有权利决定草场的命运。
6. 我们的资料显示当局曾经计划在这个地方建议兴建一座高达16层楼高共160个单位的组屋。发展商的汇报会确没有提到这个16层楼高的组屋。到底这座组屋建去哪里?还是已经不存在了。
本人和其他八打灵再也行动党领袖将致函要求市政厅正视以上数点。
Teresa Kok disturbed by Si Cheng when took part in debate
Deputy Speaker of Malaysia Dewan Rakyat, Lim Si Cheng, today kept disturbing YB Teresa Kok (DAP - Seputeh) speeches when she took part in the committee debate of Ministry of Federal Territories.
There was even one tine when Teresa shouted unfair to Si Cheng that she should be allowed to deliver her debate speech without any interferences from the Deputy Speaker.
She was almost chasen away from the House.
Abdullah’s threat to use ISA - nadir in 4 years of broken pledges on democracy, human rights, accountability, integrity
The Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi returned from the Kampala Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) and threatened to use the nefarious law, the Internal Security Act (ISA), against peaceful demonstrators – marking a new nadir of the four-year broken pledges by the Abdullah premiership on democracy, human rights, accountability, incorruptibility and preparedness to hear the truth from the people.
Read more at here.
RM4.6 billion PKFZ scandal - Chan Kong Choy still Minister-on-the-run
MCA Deputy President and Transport Minister, Datuk Chan Kong Choy has confirmed that he is a Minister-on-the-run from his sheer inability to answer five simplified questions on the RM4.6 billion Port Klang Free Zone scandal in Parliament yesterday.
For more details please follow this.
Kula: Stop the denial!
The MIC President and Works Minister has refuted in uncertain terms that MIC has been a let down to the Indian community. Barisan Ministers and MP's are also echoing the sentiments of Samy. But these assertions if true the more then 30,000 people would not have got down to the street to air their grievances.
What has gone wrong with the Indian community? Indians compose a mere 8% of the population:
1) The Indian community only controls 1.2% of the equity as compared to over 20% by the Malays and nearly over 40% by the Chinese. Out of the 1.2% of the Indian equity one person AnandaKrishana one of the richest man in the country of Indian origin possess nearly 1% of the stake. This leaves the nearly over 2 million Indians owning less then a mere 0.2 of the equity of the country. Now this is the where the so call equal distribution of the economic cake has not benefited the average Malaysian but a few businessman who have are well connected with political leaders of the country.
2) Social problems of the Indian community have been consistently overlooked and side stepped. Take for example a) Suicidal rates. The Indians have the highest suicide rate (21.1 for every 100,000 as compared with the Chinese (8.6) and Malays (2.6) The high rate of suicide clearly shows that the community members are not able to handle the daily demands of life and find a easy way out to commit suicide. B) High numbers of Indians involved in criminal cases as can be seen with over 40% of detainees at the Simpang Renggan detention. Frequently Indians who have been out of the estates land up in urban areas without proper housing and lend up as squatters. Here they find difficulty in getting jobs although the country claims full employment! The failure of the Government to quickly to assist this needy people.
3) The rampant demolishment of Hindu temples all over the country is another cry of the community. Many of the temples are sitting on private or government land .Over 500 temples have been demolished over the last few years with little respect to the sensitive of the Indian community. Hindu goddess statue have been broken with little understanding of how the Hindus feel. Although many a time this matter has been raised in parliament and even brought to YB Nazri in 2005 who said will look into the greivences but to date nothing has taken place. What is needed is a real new policy decision on Temples to be adopoted by the government.
4) Tamil Schools are in a deplorable state and there is also a shortage of teachers. Samy has said over 180 tamil schools have been built over the last two decade and another 80 new Tamil schools would be build. We doubt the figures given by Samy. Under the 9thMalasyisa plan No NEW Tamil schools would be build. That means for the nest 4 years without new schools is Samy saying the new 80 schools would be build in the 10th Malasia plan! In July 2006 over 500 Indian parents protested on the shortage of over 500 teachers in Perak. Although this matters have been raised many a time in Parliament little has been done to address this issue. Why? Is it because the Indians are insignifant as a voting block in this country?
We feel the time has come for the Government to get to the bottom of the matter and find ways to address the matters of public importance. One way for immediate way to attend to all these is to set up a revolving fund of 1 billion to be administered by a special agency of the government to up lift the economic well being of the Indian community. An annual grant of 1 billion for this agency must be done until the community is at par with the other communities.
The people in power must all stop the denial syndrome.
Wednesday, November 28, 2007
Exhange between Kit Siang and Ahmad Shabery Cheek
Kit Siang and Ahmad Shabery Cheek exchanged words on Hindraf gathering last Sunday.
Ahmad Shabery Cheek is the Parliament Secretary for Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Kit asked him question on whether Wisma Putra (Malaysia Foreign Ministry) received any official complaint from Hindu organisations / Indian government regarding the high-handed manner of the police in handling the crowd.
Kit Siang and Chong Eng visit charged Indians
Malaysiakini.com
Forty-five people will be charged at the Selayang Sessions Court today with allegedly taking part in an illegal gathering at the Batu Caves temple early Saturday morning.
The charge is being brought under Section 27 of the Police Act which stipulates the need for a police permit to gather in a public place.
They were part of a larger crowd that had gathered at the temple in the early hours of last Sunday, with the intention of participating in the Hindraf-organised rally later that morning at Jalan Ampang.
About 1,000 people who had gathered at the temple were forcibly dispersed by the Federal Reserve Unit using tear gas and water cannons.
Security is very tight at the Selayang Sessions Court with seven FRU trucks and about 30 police personnel on standby.
The Kuala Lumpur and Selangor Bar has sent lawyers to assist the 45.
Another 55 protesters will face the same charge at the Kuala Lumpur Magistrate's Court for taking part in the Hindraf rally on Sunday.
Under Section 27(5) of the Police Act, anyone taking part in an illegal gathering is liable, upon conviction, to a fine of RM2,000-10,000 or imprisonment of not more than a year.
Kit Siang and Chong Eng were there giving morel support to the Indians at Selayang Court this morning.
Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Sepak-menyepak, tendang-menendang di DUN Kelantan.
Dulu bila di Selangor, Raja Klang yang bilik rumahnya lebih besar daripada rumah kos rendah rakyat termiskin, Zakaria Md Deros, pernah sekali menampah ADUN DAP Teng Chang Khim.
Mereka pernah mengeluarkan perkataan "bocor", "monyet", menghalau orang Cina keluar dari Malaysia, "mari lawan" dan sebagainya.
Sekarang pula di Kelantan dan lebih dahsyat lagi, kali ini berlaku di dalam Dewan.
Bila pula budaya parlimen ala samseng Taiwan dan Korea Selatan meresap ke dalam Malaysia?
Adakah ini Islam Hadhari?
Ataupun kelakuan sebegini lebih mirip kepada Mat Rempit?
Bagi mereka yang tidak permah melihat keganasan wakil rakyat BN, biarkan kita melihat klip ini.
Adakah anda masih percaya wakil rakyat BN yang dipilih anda benar-benar melakukan sesuatu kepada rakyat di Parlimen atau DUN, ataupun mereka lebih berminat untuk "mari lawan" dengan pembangkang dan menjadi kaki lawan?
Anda lihatlah dengan mata sendiri.
Kula and Kit Siang speak on Hindraf gathering
YB M. Kulasegaran (DAP Ipoh Barat) tabled an emergency motion to discuss the Demonstration held on Sunday 25thNovember07 in the city of Kuala Lumpur. My motion came up to day but fornatuly it was rejected. His motion reads as follows:
Indians are third class citizens?
The wholly unnecessary and excessive use of force by police in firing of tear gas and water cannons against poor Tamils and ordinary Malaysians gathering to voice their grievances is simply intolerable and totally unacceptable in a democratic society respecting the human rights of its citizen.
Over 450 were arrested and dozens suffered serious injuries.
The use of such excessive force is evidence of the discrimination against Tamils and other fellow Malaysians, the state have shown consistently in recent years. It is yet another example of a high-handed, ham-fisted and undemocratic tactics used against poor citizens who are peacefully assembly to air their grievances.
The serious violation of human rights and the high handed manner of police and government action calls for a serious debate in this august house.It is a pressing issue because the Indian community of two million people are upset and angered. They ask whether they are equal first class citizens or unequal third class citizens who deserves such wanton treatment.
Peaceful demonstrations and marches are common and accepted practices around the world. It is a natural form of showing displeasure. Only backward uncivilized societies will use force against its own citizen.
After today Malaysia is simply a police state in the eyes of the world and its own citizens.
Hindraf (Hindu Rights Action Force) have filed a class action suit against the British government in London for taking Indians to Malaya as indentured laborers and exploiting them for 150 years and there after failing to protect their rights as minorities under Malaysian constitution and law.
The Malaysian government should take the above suit seriously and if it does not agree to it challenge it. Bullying tactics by the government and its agencies against Indians and minorities must stopped. they must be held accountable for their actions.
The police and Government should be blamed for arresting without justification hundreds of people. Many suffer serious injuries.
All this could have been avoided if the police had allowed a peaceful assembly to voice legitimate grievances.
I also brought to the house information of the unruly use of “tear gas” and exhibited 4 “tear gas” canisters. This 4 were the more then hundred odd “tear gas” canisters which were used by the police at the scene of the “uprising” near KLCC, Kuala Lumpur. Also I asked why Khairi Jamulddin the Deputy UMNO President and the son in law of the PM has been permitted to conduct demos and how come the Police see it fit to give him a permit but not to HINDRAF
The Speaker said in order to allow a full debate of the motion according to the Standing Orders of the Dewan Rakyat 3 pre conditions need to adhered to. That 1) the motion is specific – Speaker agrees 2) that the motion is of public importance –he too agrees with this but my motion failed on the issue of urgency. The Speakers mentioned that the police have not granted a permit for the demonstration and there was a court order which prohibited HINDRAF and its supporters from attending the demonstration.
It is regretted that the Speaker rejected my motion for matters of public importance could have been discussed and a strong message could have been sent to the Police and the Government.
The issue of lack of opportunities for Indians to join the civil service (in 1970 there were more then 10% now less the 5%, why?), the failure to build a single new Tamil schools under the 9th Malaysia Plan, why there is a high rate of unemployment, suicide, single mother, criminal cases, illiteracy, the indiscriminate demolishment of Hindu Temples and why over 45% of the detainees at Simpang Renggang are Indians.
A select Parliamentary committee to look into the woes of the Indian Community should be formed.
A golden opportunity to air the communities grievances could have been discussed and debated but all these has now been “swept” under the carpet and hibernating!
Monday, November 26, 2007
MIC MP K.Devamany owes public apology
A Barisan Nasional MP departed from the norm today when he said the rally organised by the Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf) reflected the Indian community's disgruntlement towards certain government policies.
YB K.Devamany (MIC-Cameron Highlands) added that the rally proved the failure of government policies which do not benefit the Indians.
The ruling politician made the remark after interjecting Parliamentary Opposition Leader YB Lim Kit Siang (DAP-Ipoh Timor) who argued that the rally was 'a cry of desperation' from the Indians.
"Some 50,000 people took to the streets yesterday. It shows the government's failure and it needs to be looked into carefully," said Devamany.
Meanwhile, Lim stood up and told Devamany not to be a hypocrite by practising double standards.
He was referring to Devamany's interview with satellite station Al-Jazeera yesterday, in which he condemned the rally.
"Devamany should publicly apologise for his Al-Jazeera interview yesterday belittling the Hindraf demonstration and condemning the demonstrators when he should be deploring the police mishandling and excessive use of force in firing tear gas and liquid chemicals against the defenceless and unarmed in Kuala Lumpur yesterday", said Kit Siang in his statement today.
示威是我们的文化
在11月的两个礼拜之内,马来西亚人民走上街头。第一场游行示威发生在11月10日又公平干净选举联盟Bersih所举办的一场4万人游行请愿。第二厂则是在11月25日举办,由兴都教权益组织Hindraf号召的3万人游行请愿。
或许你可以不赞成他们的斗争目的,但是你不能阻止他们行使宪制权利举行游行。在这两场游行中,第一场游行要求元首关注国内不公平和不透明的选举程序。这并非是新的诉求,当政府一再妄顾他们合理呼吁,他们别无他路,只能走上街头。走上街头不只是向当权者展示他们呼吁,也向世人传达他们的讯息。
这两场示威本质上与烈火莫息时代此起彼落的示威大不相同。虽然外界把这两场示威称为‘反政府’示威,其实这两场游行的直接对象并不是政府。第一场示威是向最高元首请愿,第二场示威则是向英女皇请愿。
有人说示威不是我们的文化,因此我们不应该示威,更何况我们还有选举等等。说这些话的人根本不知道自己在讲什么话。选举也同样不是我们的文化,难道我们也不要选举?
其实,一个地方只要出现压迫、不公平的事件,那个地方就会有游行、示威、情愿、集会等等。
‘示威’这个字眼一直出现在我国各民族的近代史。
印度圣雄甘地为抗议英殖民政府的统治,曾经在全印度举办多场大型和平示威、游行以及绝食抗议。
中国近代史出现五四和六四运动。爱国大专生走上街头请愿。五四运动的学生高呼反对帝国主义、封建主义的爱国运动。六四的大学生则以反贪污,反腐败,反官倒为主。
高度资本主义的香港也曾经发生争取民主的七一大游行。台湾群众曾经掀起红潮倒扁。泰国民主派人士曾经发起黄衣运动推翻前首相塔信。缅甸不久之前爆发袈裟革命。印尼学生推翻苏哈多铁腕政权也是通过同样的方式,菲律宾人民亦是通过‘人民力量’推翻马可斯和埃斯特拉达如此。
至于巫统本身,1946年巫统就曾经策划反对马来亚联邦示威和罢市活动。凯理去年在双峰塔外举办反美示威。今年巫青团也曾经参与示威反对缅甸军政府打压僧侣革命。
还有谁敢说示威不是我们的文化?
印裔选民的投票趋向
政府显然严重看待Hindraf号召的这场集会。尤其是警方更在集会前三天便在吉隆坡各个主要公路设立路障,导致吉隆坡从周四开始便出现严重交通阻塞,怨声载道。
政府的激烈反应,以及国大党领袖多次在国会大厦召开记者会,呼吁印裔同胞不要出席这场大集会,多少反映当下印裔社群对国阵政府的不满。
这种不满会否反映在选票上呢?
这是一个很重要,但又是许多政治分析员忽略的问题。
我并非是专业的政治研究员,但是当大部分人把焦点放在华裔选民和巫裔选民的投票取向时,我们不应该忽略印裔选民的投票取向。
自独立以来,我国并没有任何印裔选民占多数的国州议席选区。每一个国州议席的印裔选民人数品均不超过10巴仙。但是在许多混合选区,若10巴仙的印裔选民有一半转向在野党,再加上绝大分的华裔反对票,那么国阵如果要依赖那四、五十巴仙的马来选票过关客并非那么容易。
华裔选民长期以来对印裔选民的投票取向都是非常模糊,甚至是片面的。认为印裔选民每次口不对心的华裔选民更是比比皆是。
一般来说,我国政党长期认定印裔选民多为城市拓荒者或园丘工友,因此投票取向大多趋向于山头主义,意即以橡胶园老板的指示投票。这也不难解释为何大部分印裔选民的投票取向大多趋向于国阵。
随着最近频频发生印裔/兴都教徒被边缘化的新闻,诸如不承认克里米亚医药大学文凭学位、慕迪抢尸案、宗教自由案件、雪州政府以零度木屋为由拆毁非法兴都教庙宇、以及重新炒热的甘榜美丹事件,直至周日举行的兴都教权利大集会,在在显示印裔选民民心思变。
只是,他们的改变会否反映在他们的选票上呢?
Hindraf Rally Video: Police Catch, Foreigner Plea
You can see at another shot that a foreigner, who is a woman in light blue shirt outside Nikko Hotel, accompany by her boyfriend (or relative/friend?) pleaded to the policeman to release an innocent Indian who was caught and attacked by police.
You see, who is terrifying here? The Police? The demonstrators? Who is terrifying the tourists?
Hindraf Rally Video: See how Police catch
You can see one policeman dragged an hand-cuffed Indian across the street and another scene shows a group of policemen crashed into Citibank lobby and dragged an Indian out of no reason.
I wonder if the police had said this to those arrested according to procedure, that the police must identify himself and informed the arrested why he was arrested and hand-cuffed.
It will be a gross power abuse if the police acted in such a harsh manner.
Hindraf Rally Video: Police "eating" their own tear gas
Hindraf Rally Video: FRU started the crack-down
After reinforcing themselves and firing several teargases, FRU started to move in to disperse the crowds. Followed tightly behind the FRU are plainclothes and uniformed policemen and women.
You can also see a FRU member holding a M-16 machine gun.
Is he going to fire live bullets??
I have managed to hide inside them and had noticed that they are growingly impatient as they have been trying to chase away the crowd since early morning but to no avail.
The commander shouted that the police can "catch at will", meaning they are allowed to catch and hit any Indian on the street, whether they are walking, eating or doing nothing on the street.
Such harsh targetting invites criticism as it is a clear violation of human rights as the police even raided a nearby Mamak restaurant where some Indians are having their lunches inside.
Hindraf Rally Video: FRU March and Shout
This scene shows how the FRU reinforce themselves and prepare to attack the crowd.
They marched and shouted loudly with the intention to terrify the gathering crowd along Jalan Ampang.
Sunday, November 25, 2007
Al Jazeera: Ethnic Indians protest in Malaysia
Members of Malaysia's Indian community have protested on the streets of Kuala Lumpur, the capital.
They are demanding equal rights in a country they believe discriminates against them.
They are also said to place blame on the colonial policies of Britain, and were intending to deliver a petition to the British High Commission in Malaysia.
Al Jazeera's Hamish MacDonald was there.
Hindraf Rally Video Pt 11
"Today the Malaysian Government lost votes from all Indians in Malaysia".
This is what chanted form this gentleman in red T-shirt.
Will Malaysian Indians come out and vote the opposition in the coming general election?
They also said that they are prepared to go to jail to fight for their rights.
Hindraf Rally Video Pt 10
Hindraf Rally Video Pt 9
Some of his friends are following him.
People are angry but they never acted violently against the police.
Hindraf Rally Video Pt 7
He was arrested early in the morning while sitting at a bus stop. He claimed that he was unlawfully arrested as the office who arrested him did not tell him the reason why he was arrested.
What is ridiculous here is that the police seemed to arrest any Indian on the street whether they are participating in the Hindraf protest or not.
My argument is that even if they are going to participate, they should not simply arrest people without following proper procedure!
Hindraf Rally Video Pt 6
This is a video showing some Indians talking and explaining to a foreigner, likely to be tourist.
Actually there were some tourists around KLCC yesterday despite the high tension between the police and the demonstrators. Maybe to them, they are used to such demonstrations as it always happen in their coutries.
I believe what is most shocking for them is the high-handed violence from the police against the demonstrators.
Hindraf Rally Video Pt 4
Police raided a Nasi Kandar restaurant located along Jalan Ampang at about 12:52pm.
Policemen in uniform and plain clothes rushed in the restaurant when a the restaurant is full with Indians having their lunches to catch any Indian at sight.
Such act raise question if the police can differenciate between demonstrators and restaurant customers.
This is a blatant power abuse!
Even if the demonstrators are having their meals inside the restaurant, and are not demontrating anything, the police have absolutely no right to catch anybody!
Hindraf Rally Video Pt 3
I saw an Indian who was at the video standing next to me pushed and pointed by a plain cloth police wan was shouted at with vulgar word "Bodoh" (stupid).
I quickly pushed him away and stood farside from a pavement watching a group of licensed samseng harrassing Indians eating out at a restaurant.
Hindraf Rally Video Pt 2
A scene showing an Indian standing by the roadside arrested by the police.
A plain cloth kicked him once. Another uniform policeman came and kicked him the second time. This happened in front of Wisma MCA Jalan Ampang at about 12:44pm.
Hindraf Rally Video Pt 1
Police oppressing Hindraf - The day I feel ashamed as a Malaysian
I will upload more videos and photos in YouTube. You can see some very violent act against some of our Indian friends. A Malay plain cloth pointed a finger at normal Indians walking on the street and shouted "bodoh".
When the Indians rushed to a nearby Mamak restaurant to have their meals and drinks, the police rushed into the restaurant like samseng and dragged all the Indians out.
Are they police or samseng?
You will never be able to differentiate!
Somebody must be answerable to all these violences from the men in blue.
Hindraf, I'll present - When there’s a need, why selfish to lend a hand?
I have the chance to read some comments and blog-posts on Hindraf’s rally tomorrow.
While I have a lot of reservations with Uthayakumar’s character and his way of championing his struggle with the opposition, I will participate in the rally this Sunday, not because of Hindraf, not even because of Uthayakumar, but because of equality and Malaysian-ness, that we cannot afford to witness inequality, injustices and discrimination continue to happen in front of our own bare eyes.
Some has disregards on this rally, saying that it is a communal rally for the Indians and the Hindus, especially the under-priviledged.
And because of this, they will not participate in the rally. Some are saying that race-based rally or activity is not what they stand up for.
I am using the same reason to explain why I will be present, that it is the responsibility of all peace-loving Malaysians who uphold justice and democracy to correct whatever wrongs in this country, including inequality in wealth distribution, which has resulted the Indian as an under-class in Malaysia.
The Indians in Malaysia are in despair, anxiousness and desperate.
When there’s a need, why selfish to lend a hand?
I would like to share a youtube with you, “We are the world”.
There comes a time when we heed a
certain cal
When the world must come together as one
There are people
dying
And it's time to lend a hand to life
The greatest gift of all
We can't go on pretending day by day
That someone, somewhere will soon
make a change
We are all a part of
God's great big family
And the
truth, you know, love is all we needWe are the world, we are the children
We are
the ones who make a brighter day so let's start giving
Saturday, November 24, 2007
‘大学无事要自主,有事要政府干预’——翁诗杰颠倒逻辑的最佳例子
翁诗杰的言论最为颠倒逻辑。
第一、大学何曾不发生侵犯学生基本权利的事故?校园自主是最求学术卓越、言论自由的的目标。这个目标迄今尚未实现,争取校园自主的长远目标根本不受限于‘大学到底是否有事没事’。
第二、‘有事要政府干预’——这句话并不完全正确。高教部既然负责处理高等教育事务,再加上此次李松荣案件是一宗不公案件,高教部更加有理由为李松荣平反。其实,不只是高教部有必要关注此事,所有关心马来西亚国立大专发展的人士、包括学运界人士、政界等等都应该关注。
翁诗杰的言论如同把以上两者的逻辑混为一谈,模糊公众视线。
我们更对马华和马青在这事件后知后觉,甚至是不知不觉地态度非常遗憾。迄今,我们尚未看到任何一名马华和马青高级领袖在这事件发言。
至于翁诗杰的言论,他只是充其量以‘好没有受到报告’敷衍回应。虽然他身为副高教部长应该在获得完整报告之后才能发言,但是我们不明白为何这份报告不能在第一时间就呈上高教部,还是高教部根本不理会这事件,又或者翁诗杰‘后知后觉’——等事件过了一大载之后才姗姗来迟向博大索取报告?
一旦高教部接获李松荣的上诉后,如果发现整个审讯过程出现违反自然公平原则的事项,高教部是否准备推翻博大的判决?高教部会否以学生基本人权作为其中一个考量点?
这些问题,只有他才能够回答。但是翁诗杰的回应从头到尾没有针对这些核心问题作出交代,反之却以政客的乌贼口吻一再抹黑在野党。
至于高教部长慕斯达法到中国推销大马大学学额形同推销员是一种耻辱,翁诗杰更不应该扭曲是非。
国会反对党领袖林吉祥于11月21日在国会针对高教课题提出附加询问时,批评慕斯达法失去优先顺序感。因为当其最大挑战是确保大马大学赢得国际认同为世界级学府的当儿,他竟到中国去向中国学生促销大马大学的学额。
林吉祥不曾说身为高教部长的慕斯达法充当推销员去吸引外国学生到大马深造是错的,也没有说这是一种侮辱。林吉祥只是说部长不知道什么是优先顺序感,即什么先处理,什么后处理,因为其当务之急是设法恢复国内大学在国际上的声誉!
我附上当天的会议记录共各位读者参考。
JAWAPAN-JAWAPAN LISAN BAGI PERTANYAAN-PERTANYAAN
1. Dato’ Markiman bin Kobiran [Hulu Langat] minta Menteri Pengajian Tinggi menyatakan justifikasi melaksanakan “International Organization for Standardization (ISO)terhadap tugasan akademik di Institusi Pengajian Tinggi Awam di negara ini.
Timbalan Menteri Pengajian Tinggi [Datuk Ong Tee Keat]: Tuan Yang di-Pertua, untuk makluman Ahli Yang Berhormat, MS ISO 9000 sebenarnya adalah satu standard bertulis yang menetap dan menyenaraikan elemen-elemen asas yang perlu ada dalam sistem kualiti sesebuah organisasi bagi memastikan perkhidmatan yang diberikan dapat memenuhi kehendak pelanggan. Pelaksanaan Standard MS ISO 9000 dalam perkhidmatan awam bertujuan untuk memastikan semua agensi kerajaan termasuk badan berkanun seperti IPTA dapat mengamalkan satu sistem pengurusan kualiti yang universal dengan izin, dan berlandaskan kepada standard yang diiktiraf di peringkat antarabangsa.
Perkhidmatan awam Malaysia digalakkan mencapai taraf MS ISO 9000 bagi memantapkan lagi bagi sistem pengurusan kualiti yang sedia ada. Dalam hubungan ini pelaksanaan standard MS ISO 9000 di IPTA tidak akan menyekat kreativiti dan kebebasan ahli akademik dalam menjalankan tugas mereka bahkan dapat berfungsi sebagai blue print dengan izin untuk menambah baik dan meningkatkan sistem kualiti dan kecekapan serta keberkesanan tugas para pensyarah. Pelaksanaan standard MS ISO 9000 di IPTA telah dapat membantu meningkatkan lagi keupayaan pihak pengurusan IPTA membuat keputusan dengan lebih tepat, mewujudkan cara bekerja yang konsisten dan menepati prinsip betul pertama kali dan setiap kali yang secara langsung dapat mengawal kos kualiti bagi kerja-kerja yang berulang dan mengelakkan pembaziran serta meningkatkan produktiviti.
Standard MS ISO 9000 telah diguna pakai oleh 157 buah negara. Kementerian memberi jaminan bahawa pelaksanaan Standard MS ISO 9000 sama sekali tidak akan menjejaskan kreativiti dan kebebasan ahli akademik IPTA, sebaliknya mampu meningkatkan lagi kualiti urus tadbir IPT tempatan agar setanding dengan IPT lain di persada antarabangsa.
Dato' Markiman bin Kobiran [Hulu Langat]: Terima kasih, Tuan Yang di-Pertua. Terima kasih, Yang Berhormat Timbalan Menteri. Kita sedar keperluan penarafan MS ISO 9000 yang dinyatakan begitu banyak kebaikannya. Soalan tambahan saya, adakah pihak kementerian sudah memberi persiapan yang cukup kepada para academician bagi mematuhi beberapa standard serta prosedur yang mereka patuhi.
Soalan kedua yang juga agak ringkas ialah dalam kaedah mengukur keberkesanan atau kecekapan atau proses ulangan yang dilaksanakan oleh para pengajar atau para pensyarah ini adalah sukar untuk mengukur secara ringkas atau secara tepat kerana terlalu banyak faktor lain dan mengambil kira bidang profesionalisme mereka juga kerana sebagai pendidik mereka mempunyai bidang-bidang yang berbeza. Kayu ukur yang sama tidak boleh digunakan kepada pengajar kejuruteraan dengan pengajar-pengajar di bidang ekonomi dan sebagainya. Bagaimanakah kementerian melihat kaedah ini supaya dapat diseragamkan, dengan adanya perkataan standardization yang boleh diguna pakai dalam mengukur kecekapan mereka. Terima kasih, Tuan Yang di-Pertua.
Datuk Ong Tee Keat: Terima kasih, Tuan Yang di-Pertua. Saya mengucapkan terima kasih kepada Yang Berhormat bagi Hulu Langat di atas keprihatinan beliau terhadap kualiti IPT kita. Sukacita saya memaklumkan Yang Berhormat bahawa sesungguhnya pelaksanaan piawaian ISO ini bukanlah secara paksa dan bukanlah diseragamkan oleh kementerian saya. Sebaliknya ia adalah terserah kepada IPTA masing-masing. Ini kerana ia mengenai IPTA yang dibangkitkan tadi jadi saya jawab mengenai IPTA. Ia tidak merangkumi sebarang sukatan ataupun kaedah penyukatan terhadap urusan akademik tetapi sebaliknya ia lebih menjurus ke arah piawaian khas untuk urusan kewangan, urus tadbir kewangan, pendaftaran dan juga sumber manusia. Ia bukannya secara khusus seperti mana yang disarankan oleh Yang Berhormat diimposed, dengan izin ataupun ia bukanlah dikhususkan untuk menyekat ataupun mengawal selia kualiti sesuatu program pengajian, khasnya dalam sesuatu jurusan pengajian yang khusus.
Tuan Lim Kit Siang [Ipoh Timor]: Apakah guna piawaian ISO 9000 apabila mutu universiti-universiti - IPTA semakin merosot yang dilihat daripada ranking terkini, Times Higher Education Supplement di mana semua universiti terkeluar daripada senarai 200 hingga sekarang kita tengok, kita tidak tahu apa universiti yang boleh kata the premier university. Who is the best universiti yang ada di Malaysia. Adakah Universiti Malaya, tidak tahu? Sudah jatuh dan kalah kepada UKM tahun lalu dan tidak diiktiraf sebagai five stars university di dalam satu petunjuk yang dibuat oleh kerajaan sendiri. Adakah UKM sudah jatuh dalam tahun ini? Adakah Universiti Sains Malaysia di tangga ke-307 dan kenapa ini semua berlaku. Bukankah apa yang lebih mustahak ialah mengadakan emphasis mengenai bagaimana boleh memulihkan keunggulan, excellent meritokrasi universiti-universiti kita. Bukan semacam apa yang berlaku ISO 9000, UUCA semacam Universiti Putra Malaysia sekarang di mana mahasiswa Lee Sung Young dianiayai. Apabila Universiti Putra Malaysia sudah jatuh 52 tangga tahun lalu, 292 kepada tahun ini 364, bukankah emphasis semua sudah silap. Menteri Pengajian Tinggi pergi ke China menjadi salesmen untuk mendapatkan lebih pelajar-pelajar China datang ke Malaysia. Yang mustahak sekarang ialah bagaimana boleh memastikan adakah universiti-universiti Malaysia boleh dilihat dan diiktiraf sebagai antara 200 universiti yang terbaik di dunia.
Datuk Ong Tee Keat: Tuan Yang di-Pertua, saya sungguh terperanjat dengan apa yang telah dibangkitkan oleh Yang Berhormat Ipoh Timor khasnya beliau merupakan seorang Ahli Parlimen yang begitu berpengalaman luas dan lama. Kita sedia maklum bahawa piawaian ISO itu seperti mana yang telah saya sebutkan tadi ia adalah lebih tertumpu kepada piawaian urus tadbir dan bukannya untuk menyukat prestasi ataupun keberkesanan sesuatu program akademik sepertimana Yang Berhormat sendiri hubung kaitkan.
Saya rasa terperanjat kerana Yang Berhormat sama ada beliau selama ini yang menguar-uarkan tentang keprihatinan beliau terhadap international ranking dengan izin yang rupa-rupanya saya kira beliau sampai sekarang pun belum lagi faham apa sebenarnya kaedah yang terkandung dalam sistem international ranking times higher education supplement yang dibangkitkan. Itu pun bukan satu kayu pengukur yang tunggal tetapi pihak kementerian tetap ambil maklum dan tindakan yang sewajarnya untuk mengatasi kelemahan-kelemahan yang masih lagi terkandung dalam sistem kita. Itu tiada hubung kaitnya dengan soalan asal sebab soalan asal itu adalah atas ISO, piawaian yang telah saya sebutkan tadi. Yang Berhormat cuba hendak hubung kaitkan ini
Tuan Lim Kit Siang [Ipoh Timor]: [Menyampuk]...adakah ini sikap...
Datuk Ong Tee Keat: Yang saya hendak jawab ini, saya kena jawab secara lantang untuk menangkis apa yang diputarbelitkan oleh Yang Berhormat. Yang dicakapkan itu walau pun benar ranking itu jatuh merosot, itu benar. Kita tidak nafi. Tidak ada denial syndrome dengan izin tetapi jangan cuba mengaburi mata masyarakat.
Yang Berhormat Menteri saya, beliau bertugas di negara China bukanlah bersiar-siar, bukanlah hendak bertugas sebagai salesmen sebagaimana yang didakwa. Itu adalah satu penghinaan yang amat sangat... [Disorak]
Saya hendak maklumkan kepada Yang Berhormat kalaulah beliau bertugas untuk negara, bukan untuk menarik pelajar tetapi untuk menjaringkan kemuafakatan dengan negara China khasnya universiti-universiti yang tersohor di negara China, apa salahnya... [Disorak]
Hindraf rally roadblocks – Would it be better to release the police to prevent crime?
I found it totally ridiculous for police to set up numerous roadblocks across Selangor on roads leading to Kuala Lumpur, causing major traffic jams since yesterday morning bringing the rush-hour traffic to a crawl.It is reported that the roadblocks are set-up to prevent criminal activities. However it was widely believed that the roadblocks are to slow down the traffic in order to prevent people from attending a massive public rally organized by Hindus Rights Action Force (Hindraf) on Sunday morning in front of the British High Commission to present a petition to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth to support a class-action suit against Her Majesty's government for bringing Indians to Malaysia as indentured labourers and exploiting them for 150 years.
Such roadblocks are totally unnecessary as the said public rally is to take place on Sunday morning and the roadblocks have cause massive and unnecessary inconveniences to motorists.
Right to peaceful gathering is a fundamental human rights enshrined under the Federal Constitution. So long so public order is maintained, no party including the police should bar people from attending any peaceful gathering.
It is even more ridiculous for the police to try to ‘lock’ traffic flow in the Klang Valley as it is not to the benefit of the country’s economy and productivity.
Today is another working day and some could be working tomorrow. Such roadblocks should be removed at once, especially when some of these roadblocks are not properly manned by police personnel.
Or the police not have any other better things to do until they have to waste taxpayers’ monies for such unnecessary roadblocks which serve no improvement to crime prevention?
Would it be not better if the police can fully utilize these personnel and release them for genuine crime prevention duties?
Friday, November 23, 2007
Hindraf's leaders released in Klang Session Court today
Three Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf) leaders who were to be charged with sedition at the Klang Sessions Court this afternoon, managed to walk free on technical grounds.
The trio, who were not charged today, were granted bail set at RM800 per person by judge Zumaidah Mohd Idris.
However, Hindraf chairperson and lawyer P Waythamoorty refused to post bail as a mark of protest against the ‘police being used by the government’.
He will be detained by the police until Monday and had vowed to go on a hunger strike. He was reportedly sent to Sungai Buloh prison.
However, his brother and Hindraf legal adviser Uthayakumar and another Hindraf lawyer, Ganapathy Rao, posted bail. Nevertheless, all three will be back in court on Monday to be formally charged.
Some 2,000 supporters, who were cheering throughout the proceeding, mobbed the duo as they walked out of the court building at about 6.45pm.
The trio were represented by lawyer M. Manoharan, A. Sivanesan, K. Ramu, VS Ganapathy Rao and R Kengadharan. All of them are also DAP members except Kengadharan.
Among those who attended the procedding including Parliamentary Opposition Leader Lim Kit Siang, DAP CEC leader Ronnie Liu, DAP Selangor Secretary Lau Weng San, DAP Selangor State Committee Member T. Kannan and DAP Selangor Vice Chairman Peter Tan.